Open Access

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

Determining the most suitable control algorithm for a system is not an easy task. In theory, each controller has its own advantages and disadvantages comparing to the others. However, in the real world, the behavior of the controller also depends on many other factors such as the calculating ability of the control board, the accuracy of the sensors, the way the hardware communicate with the others, etc. In order to find the pros and cons of each control algorithm in the real world, each of them has to be tested and then comparing their results. This article presents a simple way to test the behavior of various control algorithms, with the quadrotor as the control target and ArduPilot is the framework to create the firmware carrying multi controllers. At the end of this article, the results of 3 control algorithms: Original PID of ArduPilot, new developed PID and Integral Backstepping will be presented and compared. These data is created by using Software In The Loop simulation (SITL), a tool provided by ArduPilot to test the new developed firmware.



Author's Affiliation
Article Details

Issue: Vol 18 No 4 (2015)
Page No.: 170-178
Published: Dec 30, 2015
Section: Engineering and Technology - Research article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v18i4.1003

 Copyright Info

Creative Commons License

Copyright: The Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 How to Cite
Nguyen, Q., Grolleau, E., & Ngo, H. (2015). Results and comparision between different control algorithms for a quadrotor using ArduPilot framework. Science and Technology Development Journal, 18(4), 170-178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v18i4.1003

 Cited by



Article level Metrics by Paperbuzz/Impactstory
Article level Metrics by Altmetrics

 Article Statistics
HTML = 1265 times
Download PDF   = 734 times
Total   = 734 times