SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL

An official journal of Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam since 1998

Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

 Section: NATURAL SCIENCES

HTML

85

Total

24

Share

Quantitative analysis of fresh tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) for trace of pesticide residues from markets in Peshawar, Pakistan, using High Performance Thin Liquid Chromatography technique






 Open Access

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

Background: Vegetables and fruits are vital constituents of human diet, as it provides necessary minerals and nutrients to human body to carry out biological reactions and provide protection against various diseases and injuries. Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) is consider as cash crop in Asian countries and are fine source of vitamin C, potassium, folate, vitamin K, and other bioactive compounds including, phenolics, flavonoids, carotenoids, and alkaloids. Similar to other crops, tomato quality and yield is also affected by pests. Globally, approximately 37.8% of tomato yield is spoiled due to pests. To maintain the vegetable quality and attain more yield, pest management approaches are applied, though extensive use of toxic pesticides are becoming a part of our food chain and causing adverse effects.


Methodology: The present research is intended to evaluate the levels of toxic pesticides in different tomato varieties collected from four vegetable markets (Hayatabad Phase 1, Chargano Chowk, Kohat Road and Tarnab farm) in Peshawar, Pakistan. After collection of tomato samples, level of pesticide residues (Cyhalothrin, Cypermethrin, Chlorpyrifos, Bifenthrin, and Imidacloprid) were detected using high performance thin liquid Chromatography (HPTLC).


Results: After detection, level of pesticides in sample was compared with Maximum residue levels (MRLs). The magnitude of pesticides in samples was lesser to the Maximum residue levels (MRLs) provided by United State Drug Agency (USDA), though the quantity of Lambda Cyhalothrin present in the sample was almost equal to MRL (0.097 mg/kg).


Conclusion: HPTLC is an efficient approach to detect pesticide traces in fruits and vegetables. Research work should be focused on it, to identify and control farmer practices which are highly linked to pesticide contamination in tomatoes and use of biopesticides should be encouraged. The cultivation of transgenic tomatoes can also be an efficient approach to elude the utilization of toxic pesticides.

Introduction

Vegetables and fruits are the major source of vitamins and minerals required by the human body to perform various biological reactions and functions. The vegetable are also the source of bioactive metabolites which are used to treat different infectious and chronic diseases, such as obesity, tumor, and renal complications, cardiac and hepatic problems 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 . During development stage of fruit and vegetable and post harvesting storage, vegetable and fruits are infected by the pests and ultimately lessens the yield. Therefore, toxic pesticides are sprayed to avoid the attack of pests. Due to minimal labor input, rapid and vast action, exploitation of pesticides is increased 6 . Though, at early stages of plant development the intense use of pesticides direct the plant to accumulate residues. The plant surface absorb pesticides (root surfaces and waxy cuticle) and integrate to the transport system of plant (systemic) or accumulate on plant surface (contact) and cause oxidative stress 7 , 8 .

To control pests, the use of pesticides are helpful but in return pesticides open the gateways for new kind of crisis including loss of biodiversity, damage to bio-control agents, insect resistance to pesticides, accumulation of toxic components in food chain and contamination of air, soil and water 9 . Pesticides residues can stay in human body for long time and cause prolonged effects, such as abnormal births, cancer, hepatic and renal problems, cardiac omplications, Asthma, Parkinsonism and Alzeheimer’s development 10 . Nausea, blurred vision, vomiting, coma, trouble in breathing and deficit hyperactivity disorders are the common other side effects of pesticide residues 11 . The flow of these compounds in the food chain and environment also occurs because of their lavish, unplanned, mishandling and indiscriminate use 12 . Despite all the adverse effects, the use of pesticides have been increased by 1169% during the last 20 years 13 .

Tomato, being a cash crop in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is sprayed with different kinds of pesticides to minimize the crop injury due to various insect pests and thus ensure maximum production and quality. Therefore, this study was organized to analyze fresh tomatoes obtained from different areas of Peshawar city and check for residues of pesticides in it and issue recommendations in the light of the findings from this study.

Materials - Methods

Sample Collection Sites

For analyzing tomato samples for probable presence or absence of pesticides residues, samples were collected from four markets (Hayatabad Phase 1, Chargano Chowk, Kohat Road/ Ring Road Junction, Tarnab farm) located in Peshawar. After collection, all the samples were shifted to Pesticides Residue Laboratory, Agricultural Research Institute, (ARI) Tarnab Peshawar for analysis using 5 various pesticides testing mentioned in Table 1 .

Table 1 Selected pesticides for testing in residual experiments
Pesticides name Molecular formula Classification
Lambda cyhalothrin C23H19ClF3NO3 Pyrethroid
Cypermethrin C22H19Cl2NO3 Pyrethroid
Chlorpyrifos C9H11Cl3NO3PS Organophosphate
Bifenthrin C23H22ClF3O2 Pyrethroid
Imidacloprid C9H10ClN5O2 Neonicotinoid

Procedure for Extraction of Pesticides

Fresh tomatoes collected from various markets and at -4 ˚C were preserved. After one hour for further procedure the preserved samples were taken off. After thawing, samples were sliced with speed blender. Erlenmeyer flask of 500 ml capacity was used where 100 g from chopped vegetable sample was added in it. Followed by anhydrous sodium sulfate 20 g, NaCl 2.5 g and freshly prepared distilled ethyl acetate 70 ml was added. The use of ethyl acetate was for extraction. For an hour the flasks were shacked. For separation of aqueous material from other solid materials (vegetable parts that were not soluble in ethyl acetate) Whatman fluted filter paper No.42 (Sigma-Aldrich) was used.

Purification procedure

Purification procedure was carried out to purify tomatoes extract. Pesticide residues were passed through different purification steps as pesticide residues were soluble in ethyl acetate. By passing through active charcoals extracted samples were purified. At 105˚C for 4 hours charcoal was activated. One ml of extract was transferred in round bottom flask and pesticide residues were dissolved in acetone. Using rotatory evaporator sample was concentrated. Pesticide residues became concentrated after passing through rotatory evaporator and easy to identify. Concentrated samples were filtered through filter paper (0.2 μm) and analyzed by HPTLC.

Preparation of standards

At Residue Laboratory pesticide standards were available in powder form in different percentages. In 1% methanol standard solution was prepared ( Table 2 ).

Table 2 Standard preparation for pesticides
Standard % available Amount taken of standard (g) Total volume (solvent)
Imidacloprid (95.03%) 0.105 10 ml
Bifenthrin (97.03%) 0.103 10 ml
Chlorpyrifos (97%) 0.103 10 ml
Cypermethrin (92%) 0.108 10 ml
Lambda cyhalothrin (96%) 0.104 10 ml

Techniques for High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC)

For the detection as well as calculation of the concentration of pesticides high performance thin layer chromatography was used, using protocol designed by 14 . In brief, glass plates (0.25 mm thickness) were prepared. At 105°C for 30 minutes each plate was activated. Initially, various concentrations of standards were spotted, then after the development of plate the diameter and concentration of spot were noted. Between concentration and spot diameter a graph was drawn that was helpful in the assessment of pesticides in samples. Along with the standards the desired sample was spotted. Followed by placing plate in tank that contained ammonia and methanol as a mobile phase, to remove undesired material plate was placed in fume hood.

Development of plate

For the development of plate different techniques were followed as applying same detection procedures all pesticides are not detected. Some pesticides when observed under UV at 254 nm for 30 minutes gave florescence. But under UV light many other pesticides were not giving florescence so for the development of plate many other techniques were followed.

Potassium iodide and O-tolidine

O-tolidine and potassium iodide spray generate brown yellowish color. To note-down spot’s diameter, coloring reagent spray was preferred. Color intensity of brown yellowish varies with respect to the concentration of pesticides in standards and sample spots.

Enzyme Inhibition Method

This method is applied for the development of those pesticides on plate which produce color by and O-tolidine and potassium iodide but do not give florescence under UV light. Plate was placed for 15 minutes in bromine vapors. Plate was placed again in fuming hood for 45 minutes for removing exceeding vapors. For 30 minutes at 37°C Horse blood serum enzyme was sprayed on the plate. To eliminate the extra vapors from plate hot air steam was given. Then for developing color substrate solution was sprayed on the plate. Spraying step was done in an incubator.

Tiny blue spots appear beside the white background of the plate. Blue spots direct the existence of carbamate pesticides. The distance covered by the ethyl acetate and the pesticides spots was measured. To calculate concentration of pesticides, the area of spots was measured vertically and horizontally. Followed by the calculation of the Rf value was measured through this procedure.

It is worth mentioning that satisfactory results were generated using O-tolidine and Potassium iodide, therefore the technique of Enzyme Inhibition Method was not applied in our research.

Identification of pesticides

After developing the plate, presence of pesticide in extracted sample of vegetable was detected. If both standard retention factor and retention factor of samples pesticide were matched then it was determined that the sample was contaminated.

Quantification of pesticide

Quantification of pesticides through high performance thin layer chromatography was done for different concentrations by measuring the diameter of standards. Different samples were checked for plate development. Diameter measurement and comparison with the standards quantifies the amount and concentration of pesticide in samples.

Statistical analysis

Data was collected from three experimental replicates. Statistical calculations were carried out with the GraphPad Prism 5 (Graphpad Software, Inc.) and SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, IBM). The results are presented as mean values with standard errors ( ± ). The mean values were subjected to Duncan’s multiple range tests and Student's t-test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as significant.

Results

Retention factor for Pesticides residue

Retention factor of each pesticide was calculated by running the standard samples on HPTLC plate. This factor was calculated by measuring the distance travelled by the spots and solvent. Thus, it is equal to distance travelled by the spot divided by distance travelled by the solvent. The spots of Cypermethrin and Chlorpyrifos pesticides traveled more distance (8.8cm and 8.7 cm, respectively) as compare to other pesticides ( Table 3 ).

Table 3 Calculated retention factors for pesticides
Pesticide name Distance travelled by spot (cm) Distance travelled by the solvent (cm) Retention factor
Cypermethrin 8.8 13 0.67
Chlorpyrifos 8.7 13 0.669
Bifenthrin 6.8 13 0.52
Lambda cyhalothrin 7.0 13 0.54
Imidacloprid 3.0 13 0.23

Concentration of pesticides in tomato samples (mg/kg)

All the samples of tomatoes, obtained from various markets had residues of various pesticides sprayed against insects. The statistical analysis using F-test indicated that significant differences existed in values calculated for concentrations of various residues of pesticides. The tomato samples accumulated maximum concentration of Bifenthrin and Lambda Cyhalothrin (0.100 ± 0.009 mg/kg and 0.097 ± 0.006 mg/kg, respectively). It indicates that both, Bifenthrin and Lambda Cyhalothrin are the most used pesticides, or the tomato plant can easily up take these pesticides as compare to others ( Table 4 ). If the concentration of pesticides is compared on the basis of area from where the samples were collected, tomatoes from vegetable market of Chargano chowk and Kohat road contained the higher amount of pesticides residues ( Figure 1 ).

Table 4 Pesticides concentration in Tomato samples obtained from different markets
Tomato samples obtained Pesticides concentrations in mg/kg
Imidacloprid Bifenthrin Lambda Cyhalothrin Cypermethrin Chlorpyrifos
1 Hayatabad 0.091 0.105 0.096 0.018 0.062
2 Chargano chowk 0.087 0.099 0.106 0.024 0.078
3 Kohat Road 0.098 0.108 0.097 0.014 0.077
4 Tarnab farm 0.079 0.087 0.089 0.012 0.055
Mean 0.089±0.007 0.100±0.009 0.097±0.006 0.017±0.005 0.068±0.011

Figure 1 . Bar diagram showing values of different concentrations of residues obtained across various locations for tomato samples in Peshawar city (results in mg/kg) .

Comparison of pesticides concentration in samples with maximum residue levels (MRL) ratified by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

The international permissible maximum residue levels (MRL) as approved by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for the observed pesticides (Lambda Cyhalothrin, Cypermethrin, Chlorpyrifos, Bifenthrin and Imidacloprid) in tomato samples are given in Table 5 . Lamdba Cyhalothrin and Bifenthrin are the toxic pesticides and upon exposure it causes adverse effects on human health, therefore the MRL approved by USDA for Lamdba Cyhalothrin and Bifenthrin pesticides is limited to 0.10 mg/kg and 0.20 mg/kg, respectively.

Table 5 Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for the tested insecticides
Pesticides name Classification MRL (mg/kg)
Lambda Cyhalothrin Pyrethroid 0.10
Cypermethrin Pyrethroid 0.50
Chlorpyrifos Organophosphate 0.50
Bifenthrin Pyrethroid 0.20
Imidacloprid Neonicotinoid 0.50

When compared with MRLs, it is clear that the detected concentrations of pesticides residues, present in tomato samples obtained from various locations in Peshawar city, are much lower than admissible level ( Table 6 ). Though the residue of pesticide Lambda Cyhalothrin (0.097 mg/kg) is almost equal to MRL (0.10 mg/kg) ( Figure 2 ), its use in tomato crop must be reduced so that the product remains safe for human consumption.

Table 6 Comparison of observed values for various pesticide residues verses international MRLs
Mean values for Pesticides concentration in mg/kg
Imidacloprid Bifenthrin Lambda Cyhalothrin Cypermethrin Chlorpyrifos
Detected 0.089 0.100 0.097 0.017 0.068
MRLs 0.50 0.20 0.10 0.50 0.50

Figure 2 . Comparative analysis of pesticide residues obtained from tomato samples in Peshawar with Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) approved by USDA.

Discussion

In Agriculture, various kinds of chemical pesticides are used to elude insect pest attack which may be deposited on fruit and vegetable surface and contaminate the product. If the calculated amount of pesticide exceeds the extreme residue perimeter of pesticides, then it can develop various kinds of diseases 12 , 15 , 16 . In the recent study, it was noticed that UV light gave florescence to Imidacloprid and Chlorpyrifos, the desired spots became detectable, similar to that determined by Munawar and Hameed, 17 . Pesticide classes such as pyrethroid, carbamates , and organophosphate, were determined by UV light 18 . We concluded that pesticides retention factor value can never be changed by any ecological factor or irrespective of time. Retention is measured by calculating the distance covered by the spot and the distance covered by the solvent. Retention factor calculated in current research work from HPTLC for Chlorpyrifos and Imidacloprid had similarity with the outcomes of Munawar et al. 19 . HPTLC can be run for detection of various types of pesticides by applying different coloring reagents 20 . In current research study, all the studied pesticides were present in tangible quantities, though none of them was found higher than international MRLs approved by USDA. The residue of pesticide Lambda Cyhalothrin (0.097 mg/kg) in collected tomato samples is almost equal to MRL (0.10 mg/kg), these findings are in contrast to the results of Andrade et al. and Khan et al. 21 , 22 . Seven different vegetables namely onion, chilies, cauliflower, brinjal, bitter gourd, tomato, and okra were seriously affected and contaminated with emamectin benzoate, cypermethrin, lufenuron, endosulfan, profenofos, bifenthrin, diafenthiuron, and chlorpyrifos in Sindh, Pakistan 23 . Furthermore, every vegetable was contaminated with more than one pesticide and majority of samples violated the Japanese MRLs. The existence of these toxic compounds in the ecosphere and food chains also occurs because of their unplanned, excessive, unselective use and mishandling 12 , 24 . In contrast, pesticide application increased during the last 20 years by 1169 % 13 , 24 , 25 . In Pakistan the maximum level of pesticides are being used in Punjab province (88.3%), followed by Sindh (8.2%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) (2.8 %) and Balochistan (0.76 %). Out of these, only 11.9% pesticides are being consumed on vegetables and fruit crops 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 .

Conclusion

Vegetable comprises a significant portion of the daily food intake of the human population. Customers mostly ask for better quality and fresh-looking vegetables with no observable rashes or holes affected by diseases or pests. To fulfill this demand, agriculturalists have to challenge pests and disease problems by all possible means, including use of pesticides which are hazardous to human health.

The current HPTLC method is an efficient and simple protocol that can be exploited for identification and quantification of pesticides in the given food sample. It is worth mentioning that satisfactory results were generated using O-tolidine and Potassium iodide, therefore the technique of Enzyme Inhibition Method was not applied in our research.

Further, in this research project, it was observed that pesticides residues (Lambda Cyhalothrin, Cypermethrin, Chlorpyrifos, Bifenthrin and Imidacloprid) were traced in all the tomato samples collected from different market places. The magnitude of these pesticides, when compared with USDA permissible level of MRLs was comparatively low. However, the quantity of Lambda Cyhalothrin present in the sample was higher to the MRL which is an alarming situation as the continuous consumption of these poisonous chemicals may accumulate in human body and may lead to serious consequences.

Further, the molecular based study of population consuming pesticides contaminated fruits and vegetables, is suggested. Research work should be focus on to identify and control farmer practices which are highly linked to pesticide contamination in tomatoes and use of biopesticides should be encouraged. The cultivation of transgenic tomatoes can also be a substitute approach to overcome the usage of toxic pesticides.

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no competing interest.

Authors' Contributions

Shah S K, Israr S F and Khatak A K, conceptualized study design, collected, analyzed and interpreted data. Kazmi A, Ali A, Mohammad S, and Irfan M. interpreted data, prepared manuscript and did proof reading. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgment

Authors are grateful to the Pesticides Residue Laboratory, Agricultural Research Institute (ARI), Tarnab Peshawar for their support and providing research facilities.

Funding

The current research work was not funded by any agency.

References

  1. Kazmi A, Usman M, Muhammad W. Effect of Hydroxybenzoic Acid Foliar Spray on Selected Wheat Varieties under Induced Heavy Metal Stress. Global Journal of Research and Review. 2019;6:1-4. Google Scholar
  2. Mie A, Andersen HR, Gunnarsson S, Kahl J, Kesse-Guyot E, Rembiałkowska E, et al. Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: a comprehensive review. Environmental Health. 2017;16(1):111. View Article PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Kazmi A, Khan MA, Mohammad S, Ali A, Kamil A, Arif M, et al. Elicitation directed growth and production of steviol glycosides in the adventitious roots of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Industrial Crops and Products. 2019;139:111530. View Article Google Scholar
  4. Kazmi A, Khan MA, Ali H. Biotechnological approaches for production of bioactive secondary metabolites in Nigella sativa: an up-to-date review. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite. 2019;6(2):172-195. View Article Google Scholar
  5. Kazmi A, Khan MA, Mohammad S, Ali A, Ali H. Biotechnological Production of Natural Calorie Free Steviol Glycosides in Stevia rebaudiana: An Update on Current Scenario. Current Biotechnology. 2019;8(2):70-84. View Article Google Scholar
  6. Angelo MJ. The law and ecology of pesticides and pest management. Routledge. 2016;:. View Article Google Scholar
  7. Yildiztekin M, Kaya C, Tuna AL, Ashraf M. Oxidative stress and antioxidative mechanisms in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants sprayed with different pesticides. Pak J Bot. 2015;47(2):717-721. Google Scholar
  8. Dubey G, Mishra N, Prasad SM. Metabolic responses of pesticides in plants and their ameliorative processes. Plant responses to xenobiotics: Springer. 2016;:57-95. View Article Google Scholar
  9. Mahmood I, Imadi SR, Shazadi K, Gul A, Hakeem KR. Effects of pesticides on environment. Plant, soil and microbes. Springer. 2016;:253-269. View Article Google Scholar
  10. Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects. Science of the total environment. 2017;575:525-535. View Article PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Gangemi S, Miozzi E, Teodoro M, Briguglio G, De Luca A, Alibrando C, et al. Occupational exposure to pesticides as a possible risk factor for the development of chronic diseases in humans. Molecular medicine reports. 2016;14(5):4475-4488. View Article PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Khan MJ, Zia MS, Qasim M. Use of pesticides and their role in environmental pollution. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2010;72:122-128. Google Scholar
  13. Tariq MI, Afzal S, Hussain I, Sultana N. Pesticides exposure in Pakistan: a review. Environment international. 2007;33(8):1107-1122. View Article PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Parvatamma B, Rao TN. A New Validated HPLC method for determination of Cyantraniliprole and its metabolite residues in tomato fruit. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2015;8(6):383-388. View Article Google Scholar
  15. Özkara A, Akyıl D, Konuk M. Pesticides, environmental pollution, and health. Environmental Health Risk-Hazardous Factors to Living Species. IntechOpen. 2016;:. View Article Google Scholar
  16. Khan SU. Pesticides in the soil environment. Elsevier. 2016;:. Google Scholar
  17. Munawar A, Hameed S. Quantification of pesticide residues in vegetables by different chromatographic techniques. Journal of Chromatography & Separation Techniques. 2013;4:1000200. View Article Google Scholar
  18. Fan H, Smuts J, Walsh P, Harrison D, Schug KA. Gas chromatography-vacuum ultraviolet spectroscopy for multiclass pesticide identification. Journal of Chromatography A. 2015;1389:120-127. View Article PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Munawar A, Hameed SW, Sarwar M, Wasim M, Hashmi AS, Imran M. Identification of pesticide residues in different vegetables Collected from market of Lahore, Pakistan. Journal of Agro Alimentary Processes and Technologies. 2013;19:392-398. Google Scholar
  20. Meena AK, Sinha A, Verma S, Gupta M, Padhi M. HPTLC Profile of important Indian spices used in ayurvedic formulations. Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2013;5(4):188-193. Google Scholar
  21. Andrade GCRdM, Monteiro SH, Francisco JG, Figueiredo LA, Botelho RG, Tornisielo VL. Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry and dynamic multiple reaction monitoring method for determining multiple pesticide residues in tomato. Food chemistry. 2015;175:57-65. View Article PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Khan MS, Shah MM, Mahmood Q, Hassan A, Akbar K. Assessment of pesticide residues on selected vegetables of Pakistan. J Chem Soc Pak. 2011;33(6):816. Google Scholar
  23. Sheikh S, Nizamani S, Panhwar A, Mirani B. Monitoring of pesticide residues in vegetables collected from markets of Sindh, Pakistan. Food Science and Technology Letters. 2013;4(1):41. Google Scholar
  24. Syed JH, Alamdar A, Mohammad A, Ahad K, Shabir Z, Ahmed H, et al. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from Pakistan: a review of the occurrence and associated human health risks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2014;21(23):13367-13393. View Article PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Bailey HD, Infante‐Rivard C, Metayer C, Clavel J, Lightfoot T, Kaatsch P, et al. Home pesticide exposures and risk of childhood leukemia: Findings from the childhood leukemia international consortium. International journal of cancer. 2015;137(11):2644-2663. View Article PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Damalas CA, Khan M. RETRACTED: pesticide use in vegetable crops in Pakistan: insights through an ordered probit model. Elsevier. 2017;:. View Article Google Scholar
  27. Khan M, Mahmood HZ, Damalas CA. Pesticide use and risk perceptions among farmers in the cotton belt of Punjab, Pakistan. Crop Protection. 2015;67:184-190. View Article Google Scholar
  28. Shahid M, Ahmad A, Khalid S, Siddique HF, Saeed MF, Ashraf MR, et al. Pesticides pollution in agricultural soils of Pakistan. Soil science: Agricultural and environmental prospectives. Springer. 2016;:199-229. View Article PubMed Google Scholar


Author's Affiliation
  • Syeda Kokab Shah

    Google Scholar Pubmed

  • Syeda Faryal Israr

    Google Scholar Pubmed

  • Asif Khan Khatak

    Google Scholar Pubmed

  • Abeer Kazmi

    Email I'd for correspondance: Abeer_kazmi@yahoo.com
    Google Scholar Pubmed

  • Amir Ali

    Google Scholar Pubmed

  • Sher Mohammad

    Google Scholar Pubmed

  • Muhammad Irfan

    Google Scholar Pubmed

Article Details

Issue: Vol 23 No 3 (2020)
Page No.: 708-714
Published: Sep 30, 2020
Section: Section: NATURAL SCIENCES
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v23i3.2470

 Copyright Info

Creative Commons License

Copyright: The Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 How to Cite
Shah, S., Israr, S., Khatak, A., Kazmi, A., Ali, A., Mohammad, S., & Irfan, M. (2020). Quantitative analysis of fresh tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) for trace of pesticide residues from markets in Peshawar, Pakistan, using High Performance Thin Liquid Chromatography technique. Science and Technology Development Journal, 23(3), 708-714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v23i3.2470

 Cited by



Article level Metrics by Paperbuzz/Impactstory
Article level Metrics by Altmetrics

 Article Statistics
HTML = 85 times
Download PDF   = 24 times
View Article   = 0 times
Total   = 24 times