Science and Technology Development Journal

An official journal of Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam since 1997

Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

 Section: ECONOMICS, LAW AND MANAGEMENT

HTML

1344

Total

598

Share
The impact of service quality on student retention: The mediating roles of student satisfaction and switching barriers in private universities






 Open Access  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

This research investigated the influence of university service quality, student satisfaction, and switching barriers on student retention within private higher educational institutions situated in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. A total of 410 valid questionnaires were collected for analysis, with hypothesis testing conducted using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings indicate a positive relationship between service quality within Vietnamese higher education institutions and student satisfaction. Additionally, student satisfaction has a positive association with student retention and switching barriers. Furthermore, switching barriers exhibit a positive relationship with student retention. Mediation analyses revealed that student satisfaction mediates the link between service quality and student retention, while switching barriers mediate the relationship between student satisfaction and retention. These findings contribute to the extant literature by elucidating the dynamics of service quality, student satisfaction, switching barriers, and student retention within higher educational contexts, particularly in the realm of private universities. Notably, this study establishes empirical correlations among service quality, student satisfaction, and student retention. Noteworthy outcomes include revealing the positive impact of service quality on switching barriers and identifying the robust moderating effect of switching barriers on the relationship between student satisfaction and student retention. From a managerial perspective, the constructs and insights derived from this study offer valuable guidance to the management teams of private universities, facilitating a deeper understanding of the pivotal role played by service quality in influencing student satisfaction and retention. Consequently, these insights can inform the strategic direction of private educational institutions in Vietnam.

Keywords: Service quality Student satisfaction Student retention Switching barriers Private higher educational institutions

INTRODUCTION

The significant growth of the national economy demands a greater investment in workforce expertise 1 . Economic growth creates more significant requirements for a highly educated workplace, particularly in larger metropolitan areas 2 . Private universities in Vietnam have received greater recognition and attention from the Vietnamese Ministry of Education due to their growing duties to offer a practical education curriculum and prospective workforce for the nation 3 .

Due to societal demand, numerous private universities have been quickly established to adapt and suit business purposes 4 . With the growth of private universities, they need help with multiple challenges due to the potential but competitive market . 5 , 6 The highly competitive surroundings are also compelling higher educational institutions; moreover, they must create their financial resources 7 . Universities are encountering massiveness and pressure to create value and benefit from their actions. Furthermore, it has been propelled to further commercial competitiveness by economic pressures imposed by the growth of worldwide education 8 . Hence, all private universities should explore unique approaches to attract and maintain learners 9 . Private universities’ contributions have become vital in ensuring the development and achievement of students in service 10 . Although many students enrol in colleges and universities, private university retention and graduation rates remain low 11 . The large number of students seeking university and the relatively inadequate retention rates highlighted the significance of providing outstanding and appropriate service quality to foster a sense of satisfactory academic fulfillment and boost retention 12 .

Student retention is a critical organisational issue with significant worldwide consequences. Students who drop out of university lack the chance to enhance their ability to think critically, have less income in their future jobs, and frequently leave university with loans to repay; universities with retention issues suffer a significant decrease in revenue, and for countries, higher education systems that may boost advancement in society and provide the were experts intellectual and skills required in the twenty-first century are undermined by high levels of dropout 13 . The vast range of places where retention studies have been conducted in recent years reflects the significance of retention in educational institutions 14 . Student retention has long been a source of concern for higher education institutions, attracting the attention of lecturers, policymakers, and scholars 15 .

According to the findings of many studies, service quality attributes are crucial at private educational institutions for building positive interactions with students and enhancing the proportion of student retention 16 , 17 , 18 . Nonetheless, most private universities in Vietnam should have the understanding and drive for satisfaction and retention. On the other hand, students’ satisfaction and learning success are critical in developing excellent employees and managers, providing substantial benefits to the growth of a nation’s economy and society 19 , 20 , 21 .

In the context of a competitive educational market, student retention is seen as a critical statistic for determining how well an educational institution satisfies the demands of its students 22 . Furthermore, private universities should put tremendous effort into sustaining student retention rates 23 . In addition, previous research has shown that service quality, satisfaction among students, and switching barriers all impact student retention 23 , 24 , 25 and that switching barriers affect student retention 25 . Service quality also influences students’ perceptions positively 24 , and student satisfaction substantially influences student retention 23 . However, many scholars have studied service quality and satisfaction, and various outcomes have been found depending on the specific point of time and the characteristics of the respondents. Therefore, studies in this field should be conducted in various contexts to expand the current knowledge on this phenomenon. Future studies should collect samples from diverse students 26 . Additionally, mediating factors, such as student satisfaction and switching barriers, contribute to the relationship between service quality and students’ behavioral intentions 27 , 28 .

Since the first appearance of many kinds of higher educational sectors, private universities in Vietnam have undergone substantial change and significantly contributed to the nation’s general growth 29 . Due to the increased choices for undergraduate study available to students today, the higher educational sector is becoming more competitive 30 . Service quality and student satisfaction have improved significantly due to the impacts of higher education quality accreditation 31 . This study investigated these elements in the context of Vietnamese private universities after the COVID-19 pandemic to examine whether there were any changes before or after the pandemic.

The first study objective is to examine the impact of the determinants of service quality (including reliability, responsiveness, empathy, assurance and tangibles) on student satisfaction and switching barriers. The second objective is to examine the impact of student satisfaction on student retention and switching barriers. Next, the study will examine the impact of switching barriers on student retention. The fourth purpose is to examine the mediating impact of student satisfaction on the relationship between the determinants of service quality and student retention, and the last objective is to examine the mediating impact of switching barrier factors on the relationship between student satisfaction and student retention. The study will be conducted in the context of private universities in Ho Chi Minh City.

This study has made significant contributions to service quality in universities, student satisfaction, switching barriers, and student retention, as well as to the understanding of the relationships among these elements. Policymakers at private educational institutions could benefit enormously from the outcomes by using them to enhance current approaches and principles, create strategies to attract potential new students and keep current ones by delivering them high-quality services. In the Vietnamese context, there are more than 242 higher educational institutions, while there are 176 public universities and 66 private universities 21 . This has created a competitive educational industry, and many large investors are pouring capital into this industry. Understanding which factors affect student retention helps universities ensure that their operations are successful by keeping the retention rate of students high and enhancing institutional quality.

This paper is structured as follows: The introduction presents the purposes and goals of the study. A theoretical review of the previous literature was conducted to create a basis for this study context, and a model of this study and hypotheses were established. The methodology section focused on the research design, data collection methods and measurement scales. The results section analyzes the collected data and reflects the study’s outcomes. The chapter also provides the literature research findings after examining the proposed hypotheses. The discussion section describes the outcomes of the study and provides some implications. Finally, the conclusion section describes the limitations and recommendations of the study.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Service quality. Service quality is determined by contrasting client expectations with perceptions of how well goods or services work 32 . The overall excellence of the services is assessed by evaluating the discrepancy between client expectations and views of service outcomes 33 . “Perceived service quality” describes how consumers evaluate a product’s or service’s overall value by contrasting what they expect from it with what they receive 34 . In higher education, the discrepancy between a student’s expectations and their views of delivery is called service quality 35 . The learner’s perspective is critical for evaluating the quality of service in higher education 36 , 37 . Students, the government, and professional organisations have a unique sense of service quality according to their respective needs 38 . Student reviews of service quality provided beneficial data for a university’s progress 39 . Service quality also improves the image of a university 40 . Therefore, assessing student responses regarding service quality is crucial 41 . Five dimensions can be applied to evaluate service quality in higher educational institutions: tangibles, responsiveness, reliability, empathy and assurance 42 .

Tangibles are considered appropriate physical facilities, equipment and devices and sufficient rooms for studying and researching. Responsiveness is how easily and quickly students may contact the individuals they need, such as lecturers and staff. Reliability in service quality may be understood by developing specific objectives, standards, policies, and regulations that are implemented equitably and firmly to enforce compliance with the course’s expected results 43 . The ability to instil confidence and belief in students through the services offered is an assurance element 42 . The degree to which the scores of the students were rated and how courteously they dealt with and solved the students’ concerns contributed to the knowledge of the Assurance factor 44 .

The previous three decades have seen a true evolution of the service quality paradigm, especially in the context of higher education. Providing excellent service quality is one of an organization’s most essential requirements since it is not only a competitive advantage and corporate offering but also an essential survival strategy and driver of corporate profitability 45 , 46 , 47 . Service quality in the higher education sector is vital to an institution’s success 48 . As a result, providing quality service has become a crucial priority for most higher education institutions to differentiate themselves from similar competitors 49 .

Student satisfaction. Student satisfaction refers to an intellectual perspective and sense of emotion from a student’s general assessment of the educational service they received 50 . Students’ satisfaction with the university is understood as their intellectual or emotional reaction to a specific or consistent set of services the institution provides 51 . Satisfaction comprises aspects concerning students’ perceptions and experiences at university 52 . Student satisfaction is a psychological response to a service experience and the situation of mind of a person who has received a result that meets his or her requirements and desires 53 , 54 .

The significance of student satisfaction in higher educational institutions has been proven recently 55 . When current students are satisfied with their universities, they are more likely to be introduced to others, and in contrast, the universities’ reputations will be destroyed by unsatisfied students 56 .

Switching barriers. Switching barriers include anything that causes it to be more complicated or costly for clients to move providers, such as implementing switching fees 57 . The breakdown of personal connections with suppliers of services is a barrier to switching 58 . In higher education, switching barriers are defined as any obstacles students encounter to transfer from their current university, including switching costs, attraction to alternatives, and emotional obstacles 59 . Investigating switching barriers can effectively prevent customers’ switching intentions or increase customers’ retention, which is essential for any organization 60 .

Student retention. The retention of customers is the continuity of a customer’s commercial connection to a business 61 . In the context of the educational sector, student retention can be defined as completing the academic curriculum 62 . The retention of students can also be defined as the percentage of enrolling students who leave or continue their studies at an institution 63 . Student retention is the ongoing enrollment process for two or more quarters 64 . With the rise of foreign universities in Vietnam and the increasing popularity of studying abroad, the withdrawal of students has expanded. In other words, the retention rate of students has decreased 65 , 66 .

Service quality positively impacts student satisfaction in Vietnamese higher educational institutions. Several studies have shown that service quality directly influences customer satisfaction 67 . The most significant indicator of consumer satisfaction is service quality 68 , 69 . Service quality significantly impacts customer satisfaction 70 . Students would not switch to their current university if they were satisfied with the quality service of their university 71 . Student satisfaction and curriculum image improved as a result of their service quality evaluations 72 . The impacts of university quality of service on satisfaction among students imply that the institution's service, product, and atmosphere improve satisfaction 73 .

Student satisfaction positively impacts student retention in Vietnamese higher educational institutions. Customer satisfaction is the organization’s most popular and essential tool for assessing customer perception 74 . Customers who are satisfied with a service have positive behavior and intentions to use that service repeatedly 75 , 76 . Excellent customer satisfaction might increase customer retention 77 . Customer satisfaction is critical for customer retention 78 . The significance of service quality variables on the retention of customers 79 , 80 .

Higher education students are more likely to stay there and achieve their educational pursuits when their universities fulfill their requirements 81 . The association between satisfaction and retention may be highest when the student perceives the college or university to give what they require to accomplish their educational objectives and expectations 82 . Various studies have demonstrated that student satisfaction impacts students’ decision to stay and finish their educational program 83 , 84 , 85 . Student satisfaction accounts for 32.6% of future participation differences 86 .

Student satisfaction positively impacts switching barriers in Vietnamese higher educational institutions. The crucial role of satisfaction in maintaining consumer repurchasing of products and services in their study is determining the factors that sustain the customer retention rate of customers 87 . The connection between obstacles to switching and satisfaction was examined 88 . In the banking sector, consumer satisfaction has a positive impact on preventing customer switching behavior 89 .

Switching barriers are defined as any limits students encounter in transferring from their existing university, including objective situational factors such as switching costs, attraction to alternatives, and psychological barriers 26 . Satisfied students will have significant switching barriers in the higher education sector. Higher education institutions will provide substantial switching barriers for satisfied students. Nevertheless, despite the minimal switching hurdles, unsatisfied students can decide to remain at their university 7 . Customer satisfaction impacts perceived switching costs 90 .

Switching barriers positively impact student retention in Vietnamese higher educational institutions. Many studies have investigated the association between switching barriers and customer retention 91 , 92 , 93 . Switching barriers have a strong positive impact on CR 94 . When students pay a higher tuition fee or take extra classes, they may call other universities to obtain information, which requires additional work and time. In the end, students may go through a period of confusion (psychological costs) and may accept the courses offered by their current institution 95 .

High switching barriers indicate that consumers stick with suppliers 96 , 97 , 98 . Empirical research has shown that switching costs explain customers’ preferences for staying with an existing provider 99 . The researcher also discovered that both primary and secondary switching barriers might have an impact on the retention of customers. Consequently, an organization can retain customers, even if they are unhappy, but it is possible on one condition if switching barriers are significant 100 . Switching costs can significantly contribute to customer retention since customers give them more weight when making decisions 101 .

A relationship exists between service quality and student retention through student satisfaction. Customer retention and long-term connections are positively impacted by service quality 102 . Considering the importance of mediation, customer satisfaction strongly mediates the link between service quality and customer retention 103 . A positive student perception of service quality increases satisfaction with a private university. Consequently, satisfied students will continue attending the institution and spread information about the university 26 .

There is a relationship between student satisfaction and student retention through switching barriers. Switching obstacles are more influenced by how consumers perceive competing alternatives than their availability on the market 91 . Students need to be more competent to switch universities because switching constraints and switching barriers considerably moderate the association between customer satisfaction and retention 104 . Switching barriers limit students from changing universities. The more switching barriers there are, the more behavioral retentions there are in their current higher educational institution.

Two elements impact customer retention: customer satisfaction and switching barriers 105 , 106 . Customer switching behaviors are narrowed by high customer satisfaction and switching barriers 107 . High switching costs impact customer loyalty, and customer retention is one of the components of customer loyalty; therefore, it can be concluded that switching costs impact customer retention 101 .

Service quality positively impacts switching barriers in Vietnamese higher educational institutions. When the buying process—associated with responsiveness—is longer than the customer’s expectation, he or she is more likely to move to another supplier 108 . Previous research in the Western context has indicated that poor service quality is one of the causes of switching behaviors 109 . Service failures may lead customers to switch to another supplier 110 . High service quality results in customer satisfaction, ultimately leading to consumers staying with the present providers 111 .

Figure 1 . The proposed research model

Figure 1 The proposed research model

[Download figure]

METHODOLOGY

The research procedure is divided into two sections. The factors were described first by studying the literature and then by applying them to the research. The theoretical framework was then constructed using these literature reviews. The variables’ connections were examined, and theories were proposed. Following the construction of the framework, the following step was to carefully gather the items for each variable before developing the preliminary questionnaire. The reviewers examined the questionnaire to ensure the content’s legitimacy. A group of students then conducted the pilot research to check the questionnaire’s validity and reliability before it was utilized for official data collection. The questionnaire was accurate and reliable enough to complete the survey. With the study’s objectives, a mass survey was conducted. This survey was conducted online, and participants were encouraged to participate. The data were then entered and analyzed using SPSS, AMOS and SmartPLS. The number of samples, approximately 200 to 300, illustrates the approximate and reliable results 112 .

A pretest was essential, and questions were amended before the final questionnaire was released 113 . The pilot test aimed to assess the reliability and accuracy of the proportional measurements. The questionnaire was distributed to 30 students and experts who could guarantee its accuracy and reliability by providing feedback and suggestions on the questionnaire structure, coherent logic, relevant situations, and understanding capacity. The study included a sample of 450 respondents from five famous private universities in Ho Chi Minh City, including Van Lang University, Hong Bang University, Hoa Sen University, Hutech University, and UEF University. The eligible answers were then gathered, while the invalid answers were discarded due to absent and duplicate data and unusually irresponsible responses during the analysis. The sampling quota was a selective approach for filtering appropriate applicants for the sample. A five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) was used to measure all the items.

The questionnaire was divided into two sections. The first included variables: study year, age, gender, university name, family income and hometown. The second section was concerned with the construction evaluation of all essential variables.

With a self-administered, structured survey, the author contacted students at the private universities surrounding Ho Chi Minh City and explained the study’s objectives. Using Google Forms, students were given access to an online survey that followed a standardized, self-administered method. The respondents might begin answering the questions as soon as they receive the survey link. As a result, 410 out of 450 people provided accurate results that could be used in the data analysis.

Online survey data collection requires less time and resources. Respondents might also respond at their convenience rather than at inconvenient moments while answering an online survey. However, the data collection rate of the online approach was lower than that of the offline method since individuals could find the online technique more convenient.

Table 1 shows the measurement scale used in the study. The first construct was service quality, with 46 114 , 115 . The second construct was student satisfaction, which was assessed with 7 items 116 . The third construct was switching barriers. This construct was evaluated with 17 items in 4 categories 117 , 118 , 119 . The fifth construct was student retention, with 4 items 120 .

Table 1 Measurement scales

RESULTS

Evaluation of the measurement model

Table 2 shows the demographic profile, which was accurate enough to represent the population of the study. Males and females accounted for 42.7% and 51.2%, respectively. The population ranged from 18 years old to more than 21 years old and were studying at university. The students came mainly from the five universities mentioned above.

Table 2 Demographic descriptions

Except for RS4, all the factors are shown in Table 3 had factor loadings greater than 0.7. These constructs had factor loadings ranging from 0.678 to 0.892, which is an acceptable range 121 . As a result, the factors indicated acceptable variance for factors explaining factors. In general, the item’s measurement was deemed reliable.

Table 3 Factor loadings of the items

Table 4 reported that the CR of all the constructs was greater than 0.7. All the constructs reflected the high internal consistency and dependability of the study model 122 . This study also determined that a Cronbach’s alpha greater than 0.6 was acceptable. In detail, the Cronbach’s alpha values in this study were all above 0.7 123 . The average extracted variance (AVE), used to test construct convergent validity, should be more than 0.5 124 . The mean value was computed by taking the square of each item loading on a build. In this study, the AVE values ranged from 0.532 to 0.683, which indicated convergent validity. This finding also implied that a construct might account for at least 50% of the variance in its elements. Overall, all the constructs were greater than 0.5, supporting convergent validity.

Table 4 Findings of internal consistency

The heterotrait–monotrait ratio is a tool for testing the discriminant validity of a construct. The heterotrait-monotrait method is the means of heterotrait-heteromethod correlations divided by the average of monotrait-heteromethod correlations 125 . The average mean of the heterotrait-hetero method must be used to distinguish between the two constructs. The Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio should be less than one 125 , whereas other researchers contend that 0.9 is the appropriate cutoff point for assessing discriminant validity 126 .

The Heterotrait–Monotrait ratio for discriminant validity is shown in Table 5 . The discriminant validity between the two reflective constructs was less than 0.9, which was acceptable for obtaining discriminant validity. As a result, the Heterotrait-Monotrait discriminant validity was sufficient.

Table 5 Heterotrait–Monotrait Ratio

Evaluation of the structural model

Table 6 Structural model fit

R 2 is “the overall effect size measure for the structure model.” The R 2 value, also known as the coefficient of determination, was used to analyze how well independent constructions explain the dependent construct. R 2 values greater than 0.1 reflect the model’s quality of fit and forecast model correctness 125 . The greater the R 2 score is, the better the level of prediction accuracy. As shown in Table 6 , the R 2 of student retention was 0.068%, which was lower than 0.1; student satisfaction, 0.420%; and switching barriers, 0.375%, above 0.1. This also meant that the model was able to illustrate 6.8%, 42% and 77.5% of the differences in student retention, student satisfaction, and switching barriers, respectively.

The Q 2 value, in addition to the R 2 value, is used to evaluate model fit. A Q 2 value greater than 0 showed that the model predicts this specific construct when given an absolute reflective dependent variable. A Q 2 score greater than zero indicated that the dependent variables were predictive. The blindfolding technique was utilized with an omission distance of five to obtain the Q 2 value 127 . Table 6 reveals that the Q square values of student retention (0.059), student satisfaction (0.393), and switching barriers (0.285) were greater than zero, suggesting that the dependent variables (student retention, student satisfaction, and switching barriers) were predictive. As a result, the importance of the model goodness of fit was determined.

Table 7 Path coefficients and hypothesis testing ( direct effect)

Hypothesis 1 (H1) was tested, and the results showed that reliability positively affected student satisfaction (β=0.158, p=0.006). Hypothesis 2 (H2) was tested, and the results showed that responsiveness positively affected student satisfaction (β=0.206, p=0.001). Hypothesis 3 (H3) was tested, and the results showed that empathy positively affected student satisfaction (β=0.162, p=0.010). Hypothesis 4 (H4) was tested, and the results showed that sssurance positively affected student satisfaction (β=0.171, p=0.007). Hypothesis 5 (H5) was tested, and the results showed that tangibles positively affected student satisfaction (β=0.240, p=0.000). Hypothesis 6 (H6) examines whether student satisfaction significantly affects student retention. The results demonstrated that student satisfaction significantly affects student retention (β=0.179, p=0.001). Hypothesis 7 (H7) examines whether student satisfaction affects switching barriers. The results demonstrated that student satisfaction affects switching barriers (β=-0.328, p=0.000). Hypothesis 8 (H8) examines whether switching barriers affect student retention. The results demonstrated that switching barriers affect student retention (β=0.162, p=0.001).

Table 8 Path coefficients and hypothesis testing ( indirect effect)

Hypothesis 9 (H9) evaluates whether student satisfaction mediates the relationship between reliability and retention. The indirect effect was positive (β=0.028, p=0.019). Hypothesis 10 (H10) evaluates whether student satisfaction mediates the relationship between responsiveness and retention. The indirect effect was positive (β=0.037, p=0.065). Hypothesis 11 (H11) evaluates whether student satisfaction mediates the relationship between empathy and student retention. The indirect effect was positive (β=0.029, p=0.039). Hypothesis 12 (H12) evaluates whether student satisfaction mediates the relationship between assurance and retention. The indirect effect was positive (β=0.031, p=0.058). Hypothesis 13 (H13) evaluates whether student satisfaction mediates the relationship between tangibles and student retention. The indirect effect was positive (β=0.043, p=0.008). Hypothesis 14 (H14) evaluates whether switching barriers mediate the relationship between student satisfaction and student retention. The indirect effect was positive (β=-0.053, p=0.007). Hypothesis 15 (H15) was tested, and the results showed that reliability positively affected switching barriers (β=0.280, p=0.000). Hypothesis 16 (H16) was tested, and the results showed that responsiveness positively affected switching barriers (β=0.163, p=0.002). Hypothesis 17 (H17) was tested, and the results showed that empathy positively affected switching barriers (β=0.111, p=0.044). Hypothesis 18 (H18) was tested, and the results showed that Assurance positively affected switching barriers (β=0.274, p=0.000). Hypothesis 19 (H19) was tested, and the results showed that tangibles positively affected switching barriers (β=0. 0.271, p=0.000).

DISCUSSION

Service quality positively impacts student satisfaction in Vietnamese higher educational institutions. The results indicate the essential service quality for satisfying university students. This outcome is consistent with previous research, in which service quality was the most significant predictor of customer satisfaction 128 , 129 . A significant link between student-perceived service quality and satisfaction in higher education was found 130 . Consequently, service quality is the most significant predictor of student satisfaction in educational institutions. There are recommendations that educational institutions prioritize learning system quality and service quality attributes such as the design of courses, student-instructor connections, assistance and administrative support. Each trait has a variable impact on student satisfaction 131 .

Student satisfaction positively impacts student retention in Vietnamese higher educational institutions. The outcome of hypothesis testing revealed a significant effect of student satisfaction on student retention. This finding is in line with previous studies conducted by other researchers 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 . Their studies demonstrated that consumer satisfaction benefited the organization in developing a successful and long-term relationship with its customers. Student satisfaction resulted in excellent word of mouth, and the educational institution could retain students for the following academic years. Moreover, in an educational institution, student satisfaction significantly impacts student retention and loyalty 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 . As a result, satisfied students are more likely to express excellent behavioral retention.

Student satisfaction positively impacts switching barriers in Vietnamese higher educational institutions. According to the findings, student satisfaction considerably impacts university switching barriers. The study suggested that while a student’s reported satisfaction is significant, the possibility of a student switching to another university is minimal. Customer satisfaction has a favorable impact on the level of switching intention 140 .

Service quality positively impacts switching barriers in Vietnamese higher educational institutions . This study revealed the positive effect of service quality on switching barriers. This result is in line with previous studies 141 , 142 . When the institutions offer high-quality service to their students, they stay with their university and do not switch to another one. Service quality in private universities plays a vital role in shaping switching barriers.

Switching barriers positively impact student retention in Vietnamese higher educational institutions. This study additionally indicates a unique outcome: switching barriers are strongly linked to student retention in higher education. This finding is in line with a previous study 143 . Additionally, in the banking sector, switching barriers are a crucial predictor of loyalty 144 .

There is a relationship between student satisfaction and student retention through switching barriers. As the data in this study revealed, the switching barrier fully mediated the positive relationship between student satisfaction and student retention. This outcome aligns with previous research 145 , 146 showing that customers are unlikely to switch to other service providers due to high switching barriers.

A relationship exists between service quality and student retention through student satisfaction. According to the statistical analysis, student satisfaction completely mediates the relationship between service quality and student retention at private universities. Excellent service provided by higher educational institutions can meet student expectations and hence lead to student satisfaction 143 , 147 , 148 . When students are satisfied with their university, their loyalty may increase. As a result, they decide to continue their studies at their current university.

Theoretical implications

The outcomes of this study have added to our understanding of service quality, student satisfaction, switching barriers, and student retention in higher educational contexts, especially in private universities. Other studies have focused on thesedimensions 51 , 72 , 130 . The empirical correlations between service quality, student satisfaction, and student retention were also established in this study.

This study has made a significant contribution to the development of empirical research on the issue. This study added to the evidence that student satisfaction completely mediated the connection between student service quality and student retention, which is consistent with previous research 103 , 143 , 102 , 149 , 150 .

One of the significant outcomes was that service quality had a positive impact on switching barriers, which was the same as the findings of previous studies 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 . Higher service quality created more substantial barriers, discouraging students from switching to other universities. The quality of service could significantly influence the decisions of students to remain with their current provider rather than explore alternatives.

Furthermore, the findings of this study revealed that switching barriers had a solid moderating influence on the correlation between student satisfaction and student retention. When evaluating the indications of switching barriers inside a university, students were assumed to be cautious and deliberate. Other studies also reported similar results 101 , 105 , 106 , 107 .

Managerial implications

In terms of management, the constructs and elements gathered in this study helped create a better understanding of the role of service quality for the management team of a private university, which has had a significant impact on student satisfaction and student retention and will guide the future strategy of private educational institutions in Vietnam.

The basic principle was that university leaders must implement higher service and education quality approaches to boost education quality, student satisfaction, and retention rate. First, service quality is critical in determining student satisfaction. As a result, satisfied students will impact their intentions to stay with the university, and they will spread positive words about their institution. This research can assist a private university’s board of council in building an excellent academic structure and serve as a reference point for university ranking standards regarding quality service features. The assurance of high-quality service by private institutions would boost Vietnam’s attempts to become an ideal international education destination. Therefore, transformation activities in higher education services are required to increase the performance standards and level of competition among private universities. This might be done by thoroughly grasping undergraduate students’ needs and expectations. In conclusion, this research provides significant evidence that service quality is a major predictor of satisfaction and retention, implying that service quality is an essential concept in the context of private educational institutions in Vietnam.

CONCLUSIONS

Limitations and future recommendations

There were various limitations to this study. First, the data were gathered solely from private universities in Ho Chi Minh City. As a result, outcomes might not be created on a nationwide scale. To provide adequate findings, similar research might be performed in private universities across the country. Second, the data were solely gathered from private universities.

Consequently, the findings of this study were helpful exclusively for private universities. A similar study might be undertaken for public universities, providing different results than for private universities. Furthermore, it was suggested that samples be collected from a diverse range of students, including postgraduate students and international students at private universities, as they may have various expectations and requirements compared to undergraduate students. Future studies may also fill in the knowledge gaps about how online education trends and digital learning platforms impact student satisfaction and retention at private universities, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on higher education.

Online survey data collection requires less time and resources. Respondents might also respond at their convenience rather than at inconvenient moments while answering an online survey. However, the data collection rate of the online approach was lower than that of the offline method since individuals could find the online technique more convenient. Future research can combine two ways of collecting data for more accurate results.

This study demonstrated a substantial causal relationship between service quality, student satisfaction, switching barriers, and student retention in Ho Chi Minh, a private Vietnamese university. The findings demonstrated that service quality impacted student satisfaction, switching barriers and retention. The board of the university council must focus more on service quality and student satisfaction. These approaches are required to attract potential new students and retain existing students to boost a university’s profit and sustainability. A comprehensive understanding of undergraduate students’ needs and wants may improve the effectiveness level and competitive advantage of private universities in Vietnam.

Measuring the impact of service quality on student retention and identifying the mediating roles of student satisfaction and switching barriers in private universities were important study goals. The analysis revealed strong associations between switching barriers, student retention, service quality, and student satisfaction. Universities should take on a more significant role by satisfying students with high-quality services. Additionally, it has determined which aspects of the service should be highlighted in marketing campaigns intended to draw in and keep current students.

Authors' Contributions

xxx

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors hereby state that the paper’s publication does not involve any conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to extend my thank you very much to the Editor-In-Chief and reviewers for supporting us.

References

  1. Son H-X, Vinh P-P. The transformation process of the private sector in Vietnam in the period of reform-awareness & reality. European Journal of Economic & Financial Research. 2020;4(2). . ;:. Google Scholar
  2. Pham L, Duong B-H. Education, globalization & citizenship: reflections of Vietnamese local school teachers & overseas-educated academics. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 2020;1-17. . ;:. Google Scholar
  3. Chau Q, Nguyen C-H, Nguyen T-T. The emergence of private higher education in a communist state: the case of Vietnam. Studies in Higher Education. 2020;1-16. . ;:. Google Scholar
  4. Slaughter S, Rhoades G. Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2004. . ;:. Google Scholar
  5. Marzo-Navarro M, Pedraja Iglesias M, Rivera Torres P. A new management element for universities: satisfaction with the offered courses. International Journal of Educational Management. 2005;19(6):505-26. . ;:. Google Scholar
  6. Tam M. Measuring the effect of higher education on university students. Quality Assurance in Education. 2002;10(4):223–8. . ;:. Google Scholar
  7. Hwang Y, Choi Y. Higher education service quality and student satisfaction, institutional image, and behavioral intention. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2019;47(2):1–13. . ;:. Google Scholar
  8. Alharthi BAFH, Khalifa GSA, Ameen A, Isaac O, Al-Shibami AH. Investigating the Influence of Strategic Planning on University Operational Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in UAE. International Business Management. 2019;13(2):49–62. . ;:. Google Scholar
  9. Pampaloni AM. The influence of organizational image on college selection: what students seek in institutions of higher education. Journal of marketing for higher education. 2010;20(1):19-48. . ;:. Google Scholar
  10. Zhou LL, Bach A, Bach V. Private universities in Vietnam: Reflection and proposition. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 2019;18(12):280–301. . ;:. Google Scholar
  11. Tri NM. Developing education in Vietnam in the context of international integration. In: 17th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning, AsiaCALL 2021; 2021; Atlantis Press. pp. 234-240. . ;:. Google Scholar
  12. Quynh NH. What motivates students engaging with public universities: a case in Vietnam. Psychology & Education Journal. 2021;58(2):1111-1130. . ;:. Google Scholar
  13. Seidman A, editor. College student retention. New York: Rowman and Littlefield; 2012. . ;:. Google Scholar
  14. Dewberry C, Jackson DJ. An application of the theory of planned behavior to student retention. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2018;107:100–110. . ;:. Google Scholar
  15. Aljohani O. A comprehensive review of the major studies and theoretical models of student retention in higher education. Higher Education Studies. 2016;6(2):1–18. . ;:. Google Scholar
  16. Hassan S, Shamsudin MFMF. Measuring the effect of service quality & corporate image on student satisfaction & loyalty in higher learning institutes of technical & vocational education & training. International Journal of Engineering & Advanced Technology. 2019;8(5):533–538. . ;:. Google Scholar
  17. Behr A, Giese M, Teguim Kamdjou HD, Theune K. Dropping out of university: a literature review. Review of Education. 2020;8(2):614-652. . ;:. Google Scholar
  18. Kamissa Y. Dropping Out From Educational System–2nd part. Open Journal for Psychological Research. 2020;4(2). . ;:. Google Scholar
  19. Ali K, Khan MA. Impact of service quality on student satisfaction: empirical evidence in the higher education context of emerging economy. AL-ABQARI: Journal of Islamic Social Sciences & Humanities. 2018. . ;:. Google Scholar
  20. Meca I, Rabasa A, Sobrino E, LĂłpez-EspiĚn JJ. Early warning methodology for dropping out of university degrees. In: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality; 2020. pp. 245-249. . ;:. Google Scholar
  21. Statista. Number of public universities in Vietnam from 2010 to 2020. . ;:. Google Scholar
  22. Wild L, Ebbers L. Rethinking student retention in community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 2002;26(6):503-519. . ;:. Google Scholar
  23. Talar Y, Gozaly J. Student Retention in Indonesian Private University. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 2020;9(3):486-493. . ;:. Google Scholar
  24. Watjatrakul B. Factors affecting students' intentions to study at universities adopting the "student-as-customer" concept. International Journal of Educational Management. 2014;28(6):676-693. . ;:. Google Scholar
  25. Nunes GC, Milan GS, Eberle L, Toni DD, Olea PM. Cocreation, value-in-use, satisfaction, and switching costs are antecedents of retention of higher education students. Revista de Administração da UFSM. 2021;14:545-567. . ;:. Google Scholar
  26. Tan PSH, Choong YO, Chen IC. The effect of service quality on behavioral intention: the mediating role of student satisfaction and switching barriers in private universities. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2022;14(4):1394-1413. . ;:. Google Scholar
  27. Binnawas MSH, Khalifa GS, Bhaumick A. The influence of higher education service quality on Behavioral intention: The mediating role of student happiness. Restaurant Business. 2019;118(10):444-458. . ;:. Google Scholar
  28. Rachmawati I. Indira Rachmawati, Zurina Mohaidin" The Roles of Switching Barriers and Corporate Image between User Experience and Loyalty in Indonesia Mobile Network Operators. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS). 2019;2:I1. . ;:. Google Scholar
  29. Zhou LL, Bach A, Bach V. Private universities in Vietnam: Reflection and proposition. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 2019;18(12):280–301. . ;:. Google Scholar
  30. Le TD, Le NV, Nguyen TT, Tran KT, Hoang HQ. Choice Factors When Vietnamese High School Students Consider Universities: A Mixed Method Approach. Education Sciences. 2022;12(11):779. . ;:. Google Scholar
  31. Pham HT. Impacts of higher education quality accreditation: a case study in Vietnam. Quality in Higher Education. 2018;24(2):168–185. . ;:. Google Scholar
  32. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry L. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. 1988;64(1):12-40. . ;:. Google Scholar
  33. Mittal S, Gera R. Relationship between service quality dimensions and behavioral intentions: an SEM study of public sector retail banking customers in India. Journal of Services Research. 2012;12(2):147-171. . ;:. Google Scholar
  34. Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing. 1988;52(3):2-22. . ;:. Google Scholar
  35. O'Neill MA, Palmer A. Importance-performance analysis: a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education. 2004;12(1):39–52. . ;:. Google Scholar
  36. Lie D, Sudirman A, Efendi MB. Analysis of mediation effect of consumer satisfaction on the effect of service quality, price and consumer trust on consumer loyalty. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 2019;8(8):412-428. . ;:. Google Scholar
  37. Demir A, Maroof L, Khan NUS, Ali B. The role of E-service quality in shaping online meeting platforms: a case study from the higher education sector. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2020. . ;:. Google Scholar
  38. Gruber T, FuĂź S, Voss R, Gläserâ€Zikuda M. Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: Using a new measurement tool. International journal of public sector management. 2010;23(2):105-123. . ;:. Google Scholar
  39. Sid Nair C, Murdoch N, Mertova P. Benchmarking the student experience: the offshore campus experience. The TQM Journal. 2011;23(6):585–597. . ;:. Google Scholar
  40. Sultan P, Yin Wong H. An integrated-process model of service quality, institutional brand and behavioral intentions: the case of a University. Managing Service Quality. 2014;24(5):487-521. . ;:. Google Scholar
  41. Lie D, Sudirman A, Efendi MB. Analysis of mediation effect of consumer satisfaction on the effect of service quality, price and consumer trust on consumer loyalty. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 2019;8(8):412-428. . ;:. Google Scholar
  42. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. The Journal of Marketing. 1985;49(4):41–50. . ;:. Google Scholar
  43. Sangeeta S, Banwet DK, Karunes S. A SERVQUAL and QFD approach to total quality education: A student perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2004;53(2):143-166. . ;:. Google Scholar
  44. Adil M, Al Ghaswyneh OFM, Albkour AM. SERVQUAL and SERVPERF: A review of measures in services marketing research. Global Journal of Management and Business Research Marketing. 2013;13(6):65-76. . ;:. Google Scholar
  45. Briggs E, Deretti S, Kato H-T. Linking organizational service orientation to retailer profitability: Insights from the service-profit chain. Journal of Business Research. 2020;107:271-278. . ;:. Google Scholar
  46. Gao L, Melero-Polo I, Sese F-J. Customer equity drivers, customer experience quality & customer profitability in banking services: The moderating role of social influence. Journal of Service Research. 2020;23(2):174-193. . ;:. Google Scholar
  47. Priyo J-S, Mohamad B, Adetunji R-R. An examination of the effects of service quality & customer satisfaction on customer loyalty in the hotel industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2019;8(1):653-663. . ;:. Google Scholar
  48. Hossain MA, Hossain MM, Chowdhury TH. Understanding the success of private universities: An empirical investigation from graduates’ perspective. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2018;35:145–162. . ;:. Google Scholar
  49. Chui TB, bin Ahmad MS. Evaluation of service quality of private higher education using service improvement matrix. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016;224:132-140. . ;:. Google Scholar
  50. Elliot KM, Healy MA. Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2001;10(4):1–11. . ;:. Google Scholar
  51. Ali F, Zhou Y, Hussain K, Nair PK, Raghavan NA. Does higher education service quality affect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Qual Assur Educ. 2016;24(1):70–94. . ;:. Google Scholar
  52. Carey K, Cambiano RL, De Vore JB. Student to faculty satisfaction at a Midwestern university in the United States. HERDSA. 2002;93-97. Retrieved August 28th, 2004. . ;:. Google Scholar
  53. Annamdevula S, Bellamkonda RS. Effect of student perceived service quality on student satisfaction, loyalty and motivation in Indian universities: development of HiEduQual. J Model Manag. 2016;11(2):488-517. . ;:. Google Scholar
  54. Lien PT. Training service quality and its effects on student satisfaction: Case of a Vietnam university. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2017;7:99–110. . ;:. Google Scholar
  55. Mihanovic Z, Batinic AB, Pavicic J. The link between students’ satisfaction with faculty, overall students’ satisfaction with student life and student performances. Rev Innov Compet A J Econ Soc Res. 2016;2:37–60. . ;:. Google Scholar
  56. Mansori S, Vaz AF, Ismail Z. Service quality, satisfaction and student loyalty in Malaysian private education. Asian Soc Sci. 2014;10:57–66. . ;:. Google Scholar
  57. Chen MF, Wang LH. The moderating role of switching barriers on customer loyalty in the life insurance industry. Serv Ind J. 2009;29(8):1105–1123. . ;:. Google Scholar
  58. Jones MA, Mothersbaugh DL, Beatty SE. Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of service switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. J Bus Res. 2002;55:441–50. . ;:. Google Scholar
  59. Tan PSH, Choong YO, Chen IC. The effect of service quality on behavioral intention: the mediating role of student satisfaction and switching barriers in private universities. J Appl Res High Educ. 2022;14(4):1394–1413. . ;:. Google Scholar
  60. Kim S. Investigating the mediating effect of switching barriers in the relationship between social service quality and switching intention. Asian J Human Serv. 2019;16:87–100. . ;:. Google Scholar
  61. Reichheld FF, Sasser WE. Zero Defections: Quality comes to Services. Harvard Bus Rev. 1990; September-October:105-111. . ;:. Google Scholar
  62. Walleri DR. Student retention and attrition in the community college: A review and research design. Gresham, OR: Oregon Community College Deans of Students Consortium, Oregon State Department of Education; 1981. . ;:. Google Scholar
  63. Wyman FJ. A predictive model of retention rate at regional two-year colleges. Community College Rev. 1997;25(1):29–58. . ;:. Google Scholar
  64. Crawford L. Extended opportunity programs and services for community college retention. Paper presented at the Annual California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Statewide Conference, Monterey, CA; 1999, March. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 429 642). . ;:. Google Scholar
  65. Hoang L, Tran L-T, Pham H-H. Vietnamese government policies & practices in internationalization of higher education. In: Internationalization in Vietnamese higher education. Springer; 2018. p. 19-42. . ;:. Google Scholar
  66. Nhan T-T, Le K-T. Internationalization of higher education in Vietnam. In: Quality Assurance in Vietnamese Higher Education. 2019. p. 25–58. . ;:. Google Scholar
  67. Ali M, Raza SA. Service quality perception and customer satisfaction in Islamic banks of Pakistan: the modified SERVQUAL model. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2017;28(5-6):559-577. . ;:. Google Scholar
  68. Santouridis I, Trivellas P, Reklitis P. Internet service quality and customer satisfaction: examining internet banking in Greece. Total Qual Manag. 2009;20(2):223–239. . ;:. Google Scholar
  69. Dabholkar PA, Shepherd CD, Thorpe DI. A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. J Retail. 2000;76(2):139–173. . ;:. Google Scholar
  70. Nunkoo R, Teeroovengadum V, Ringle CM, Sunnassee V. Service quality and customer satisfaction: The moderating effects of hotel star rating. Int J Hosp Manag. 2020;91:102414. . ;:. Google Scholar
  71. Ali F, Zhou Y, Hussain K, Nair PK, Raghavan NA. Does higher education service quality affect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Qual Assur Educ. 2016;24(1):70–94. . ;:. Google Scholar
  72. Gregory JL. Applying SERVQUAL: Using service quality perceptions to improve student satisfaction and program image. J Appl Res High Educ. 2019;11(4):788–799. . ;:. Google Scholar
  73. Theodorakis ND, Kaplanidou K, Karabaxoglou I. Effect of event service quality and satisfaction on happiness among runners of a recurring sport event. Leisure Sciences. 2015;37(1):87–107. . ;:. Google Scholar
  74. Gupta S, Zeithaml V. Customer metrics and their impact on financial performance. Marketing Sci. 2006;25(6):718–739. . ;:. Google Scholar
  75. Wu. An Empirical Study of the Effects of Service Quality, Perceived Value, Corporate Image, and Customer Satisfaction on Behavioral Intentions in the Taiwan Quick Service Restaurant Industry. J Quality Assur Hosp Tour. 2013;14(4):364-390. . ;:. Google Scholar
  76. Nguyen N, Leblanc G. Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services. J Retail Consum Serv. 2001;8(4):227–236. . ;:. Google Scholar
  77. Ranaweera C, Prabhu J. The influence of satisfaction, trust and switching barriers on customer retention in a continuous purchasing setting. Int J Serv Ind Manag. 2003;14(4):374–395. . ;:. Google Scholar
  78. Guo L, Xiao JJ, Tang C. Understanding the psychological process underlying customer satisfaction and retention in a relational service. J Bus Res. 2009;62:1152–1159. . ;:. Google Scholar
  79. Alâ€Hawari M, Ward T, Newby L. The relationship between service quality and retention within the automated and traditional contexts of retail banking. J Serv Manag. 2009;20(4):455–472. . ;:. Google Scholar
  80. Edward M, George BP, Sarkar SK. The impact of switching costs upon the service quality–perceived value–customer satisfaction–service loyalty chain: a study in the context of cellular services in India. Serv Mark Q. 2010;31(2):151-173. . ;:. Google Scholar
  81. Olsen LL, Johnson MD. Service equity, satisfaction and loyalty: From transaction-specific to cumulative evaluations. J Serv Res. 2003;5(3):184–195. . ;:. Google Scholar
  82. Al Hassani AA, Wilkins S. Student retention in higher education: the influences of organizational identification and institution reputation on student satisfaction and behaviors. Int J Educ Manag. 2022;36(6):1046–1064. . ;:. Google Scholar
  83. Boonlert Watjatrakul. Factors affecting students' intentions to study at universities adopting the "student-as-customer" concept. Int J Educ Manag. 2014;28(6):676-693. . ;:. Google Scholar
  84. Annamdevula S, Bellamkonda RS. Effect of student perceived service quality on student satisfaction, loyalty and motivation in Indian universities: development of HiEduQual. J Model Manag. 2016;11(2):488-517. . ;:. Google Scholar
  85. Hwang Y, Choi Y. Higher education service quality and student satisfaction, institutional image, and behavioral intention. Soc Behav Personal Int J. 2019;47(2):1–13. . ;:. Google Scholar
  86. Clemes MD, Gan CE, Kao TH. University student satisfaction: An empirical analysis. J Mark High Educ. 2008;17(2):292-325. . ;:. Google Scholar
  87. LaBarbera PA, Mazursky D. A longitudinal assessment of consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction: The dynamic aspect of the cognitive process. J Mark Res. 1983;20(4):393–404. . ;:. Google Scholar
  88. Giovanis A, Athanasopoulou P, Tsoukatos E. The role of corporate image and switching barriers in the service evaluation process: evidence from the mobile telecommunications industry. EuroMed J Bus. 2016;11(1):132–158. . ;:. Google Scholar
  89. Athanassopoulos AD. Customer satisfaction cues to support market segmentation and explain switching behavior. J Bus Res. 2000;47(3):191–207. . ;:. Google Scholar
  90. Calvo-Porral C, Faın~a-Medın A, Nieto-Mengotti M. Satisfaction and switching intention in mobile services: comparing lock-in and free contracts in the Spanish market. Telematics Inform. 2017;34(5):717–729. . ;:. Google Scholar
  91. Jones AM, Suh J. Transaction-specific satisfaction and overall satisfaction: An empirical analysis. J Serv Mark. 2000;14(2):147–159. . ;:. Google Scholar
  92. Kim M, Park MC, Jeong DH. The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication service. Telecommun Policy. 2004;28:145–159. . ;:. Google Scholar
  93. Wulandari DR, Surip N. Analysis of the Effects of Product Quality, Promotion & Location on Loyalty Using Satisfaction As the Mediating Variable At Lottemart of Taman Surya Jakarta. Dinasti Int J Digit Bus Manag. 2020;1(5):709-724. . ;:. Google Scholar
  94. Ranaweera C, Prabhu J. The influence of satisfaction, trust and switching barriers on customer retention in a continuous purchasing setting. Int J Serv Ind Manag. 2003;14(4):374–395. . ;:. Google Scholar
  95. Ali M, Amir H, Ahmed M. The role of university switching costs, perceived service quality, perceived university image and student satisfaction in shaping student loyalty. J Mark High Educ. 2021:1-22. . ;:. Google Scholar
  96. Hirschman AO. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1970. . ;:. Google Scholar
  97. Levinger G. Marital Cohesiveness at the Brink: The Fate of Applications for Divorce. In: Huston TL, editor. Divorce and Separation: Context, Causes, and Consequences. New York: Academic Press; 1979. p. 99-120. . ;:. Google Scholar
  98. Ping R. The Effects of Satisfaction and Structural Constraints on Retailer Exiting, Voice, Loyalty, Opportunism, and Neglect. J Retail. 1993;69(3):320-352. . ;:. Google Scholar
  99. Jones MA, Mothersbaugh DL, Betty SE. Why customers stay: Measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. J Bus Res. 2002;55(6):441–450. . ;:. Google Scholar
  100. Ullah S. Factors affecting customer retention. City Univ Res J. 2015;5(1). . ;:. Google Scholar
  101. Dick A, Basu K. Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework. J Acad Market Sci. 1994;22(2):99–113. . ;:. Google Scholar
  102. Venetis KA, Ghauri PN. Service quality and customer retention: building long-term relationships. Eur J Market. 2004;38(11/12):1577–98. . ;:. Google Scholar
  103. Ahmed RR, Vveinhardt J, Štreimikiene D, Ashraf M, Channar ZA. Modified SERVQUAL model and effects of customer attitude and technology on customer satisfaction in banking industry: Mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. J Bus Econ Manag. 2017;8:974–1004. . ;:. Google Scholar
  104. Rachmawati I. The Roles of Switching Barriers and Corporate Image between User Experience and Loyalty in Indonesia Mobile Network Operators. Int J Sci Manag Stud (IJSMS). 2019;2:I1. . ;:. Google Scholar
  105. Kim M, Park MC, Jeong DH. The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication service. Telecommun Policy. 2004;28:145–159. . ;:. Google Scholar
  106. Liu CT, Yi MG, Lee CH. The Effects of Relationship Quality and Switching Barriers on Customer Loyalty. Int J Inf Manag. 2011;31:71–79. . ;:. Google Scholar
  107. Fornell C. A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. J Market. 1992;56:6–21. . ;:. Google Scholar
  108. Gonul F, Popkowski Leszczyc P, Sugawara T. Joint Estimates of Purchase Timing and Brand Switch Tendency: Results from a Scanner Panel Data Set of Frequently Purchased Products. Can J Econ. 1996;29:501–04. . ;:. Google Scholar
  109. Liang D, Ma Z, Qi L. Service quality and customer switching behavior in China's mobile phone service sector. J Bus Res. 2013;66(8):1161–1167. . ;:. Google Scholar
  110. Keaveney SM. Customer switching behavior in service industries: An explorative study. J Market. 1995;59(2):71–82. . ;:. Google Scholar
  111. Ghobadian A, Speller S, Jones M. Service Quality: Concepts and Models. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 1993;11(9):43–66. . ;:. Google Scholar
  112. Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis. Psychol Press; 2013. . ;:. Google Scholar
  113. Burns AG, Bush RF. Marketing Research. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2000. . ;:. Google Scholar
  114. Parasuraman A, Berry LL, Zeithaml VA. Perceived service quality as a customer-based performance measure: an empirical examination of organizational barriers using an extended service quality model. Hum Resour Manag. 1991;30(3):335–364. . ;:. Google Scholar
  115. Abu Hasan H, Ilias A. Service quality and student satisfaction: A case study at private higher education institutions. Int Bus Res. 2008;1:163–175. . ;:. Google Scholar
  116. Sultan P, Yin Wong H. An integrated-process model of service quality, institutional brand and behavioral intentions: the case of a University. Manag Serv Qual. 2014;24(5):487-521. . ;:. Google Scholar
  117. Kannan S. Effects of Customer-satisfaction and Switching Barriers on Customer Loyalty in Tirunelveli District Mobile Phone Service Providers. Doctoral Dissertation, KALASALINGAM University; 2017. . ;:. Google Scholar
  118. Cho IY. Investigating the determinants of customer satisfaction, switching barriers, and customer loyalty in the mobile telecommunications market. Doctoral dissertation, KDI School; 2016. . ;:. Google Scholar
  119. Jemal A. Assessment of ERP Project Benefits and Barriers in Post Implementation Stage: The Case of ETHIO Telecom Case Study. Doctoral Dissertation, Addis Ababa University; 2017. . ;:. Google Scholar
  120. Eresia-Eke C, Ngcongo N, Ntsoane T. The nexus of service quality, student satisfaction and student retention in small private colleges in South Africa. Educ Sci. 2020;10(7):179. . ;:. Google Scholar
  121. Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strateg Manag J. 1999;20(2):195–204. . ;:. Google Scholar
  122. Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S. Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage publications; 2003. . ;:. Google Scholar
  123. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis. Seventh Edition. Prentice Hall; 2010. . ;:. Google Scholar
  124. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. . ;:. Google Scholar
  125. Garson GD. Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM). 2016. . ;:. Google Scholar
  126. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Market Sci. 2015;43:115–135. . ;:. Google Scholar
  127. Chin WW. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Application. Esposito Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (Eds.), Springer, Germany; 2010:645–689. . ;:. Google Scholar
  128. Santouridis I, Trivellas P, Reklitis P. Internet service quality and customer satisfaction: examining internet banking in Greece. Total Qual Manag. 2009;20(2):223–239. . ;:. Google Scholar
  129. Dabholkar PA, Shepherd CD, Thorpe DI. A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. J Retailing. 2000;76(2):139–173. . ;:. Google Scholar
  130. Suyanto MA, Usu I, Moodoeto MJ. The role of service quality on building student satisfaction. Am J Econ. 2019;9(1):17-20. . ;:. Google Scholar
  131. Pham L, Limbu Y-B, Bui T-K, Nguyen H-T, Pham H-T. Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction & loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2019;16(1):1–26. . ;:. Google Scholar
  132. Sharma D. Examining the influence of service quality on customer satisfaction and patronage intentions in convenience store industry. Int J Bus Globalization. 2015;15(2):152–170. . ;:. Google Scholar
  133. Srivastava K, Sharma NK. Service quality, corporate brand image, and switching behavior: the mediating role of customer satisfaction and repurchase intention. Serv Mark Q. 2013;34(4):274–291. . ;:. Google Scholar
  134. Alves H, Raposo M. Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Qual Manag. 2007;18(5):571–588. . ;:. Google Scholar
  135. Navarro MM, Iglesias MP, Torres PR. A new management element for univer- sities: Satisfaction with the offered courses. Int J Educ Manag. 2005;19(6):505–526. . ;:. Google Scholar
  136. Yu YT, Dean A. The contribution of emotional satisfaction to consumer loyalty. Int J Serv Ind Manag. 2001;12:234–250. . ;:. Google Scholar
  137. White C, Yu YT. Satisfaction emotions and consumer behavioral intentions. J Serv Mark. 2005;19(6):411–420. . ;:. Google Scholar
  138. Abedniya A, Zaeim MN, Hakimi BY. Investigating the relationship between customers' perceived service quality and satisfaction: Islamic bank in Malaysia. Eur J Soc Sci. 2011;21(4):603–624. . ;:. Google Scholar
  139. Chandra T, Hafni L, Chandra S, Purwati AA, Chandra J. The influence of service quality, university image on student satisfaction and student loyalty. Benchmarking. 2019;26(5):1533–1549. . ;:. Google Scholar
  140. Calvo-Porral C, Faın~a-Medın A, Nieto-Mengotti M. Satisfaction and switching intention in mobile services: comparing lock-in and free contracts in the Spanish market. Telematics Inform. 2017;34(5):717–729. . ;:. Google Scholar
  141. Nguyen DT, Pham VT, Tran DM, Pham DBT. Impact of service quality, customer satisfaction and switching costs on customer loyalty. J Asian Finance Econ Bus. 2020;7(8):395-405. . ;:. Google Scholar
  142. Keaveney SM. Customer switching behavior in service industries: An explorative study. J Market. 1995;59(2):71–82. . ;:. Google Scholar
  143. Tan PSH, Choong YO, Chen IC. The effect of service quality on behavioral intention: the mediating role of student satisfaction and switching barriers in private universities. J Appl Res High Educ. 2022;14(4):1394-1413. . ;:. Google Scholar
  144. De Matos CA, Henrique JL, de Rosa F. The different roles of switching costs on the satisfaction-loyalty relationship. Int J Bank Market. 2009;27(7):506–523. . ;:. Google Scholar
  145. Sugesti H. Pengaruh kualitas jasa dan switching barrier terhadap loyalitas pelanggan (survey pada pelanggan XL pascabayar di purwakarta). Improve. 2015;7(2):36–43. . ;:. Google Scholar
  146. Jones MA, Mothersbaugh DL, Beatty SE. Switching barriers and repurchase intentions in services. J Retailing. 2000;76(2):259–274. . ;:. Google Scholar
  147. Yao HL, Yu J. Empirical research and model building about customer satisfaction index on postgraduate education service quality. Can Soc Sci. 2012;8(1):108–113. . ;:. Google Scholar
  148. Mahamad O, Ramayah T. Service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty: a test of mediation. Int Bus Res. 2010;3(4):72-80. . ;:. Google Scholar
  149. Hadikoemoro S. A comparison of public and private university students' expectations and perceptions of service quality in Jakarta, Indonesia. Nova Southeastern University; 2002. . ;:. Google Scholar
  150. Al-Tit AA. The effect of service and food quality on customer satisfaction and hence customer retention. Asian Soc Sci. 2015;11(23):129. . ;:. Google Scholar


Author's Affiliation
Article Details

Issue: Vol 27 No 1 (2024)
Page No.: 3315-3332
Published: Mar 31, 2024
Section: Section: ECONOMICS, LAW AND MANAGEMENT
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v27i1.4240

 Copyright Info

Creative Commons License

Copyright: The Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 How to Cite
Oanh, T., & Tho, A. (2024). The impact of service quality on student retention: The mediating roles of student satisfaction and switching barriers in private universities. Science and Technology Development Journal, 27(1), 3315-3332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v27i1.4240


 Download Citation
 Cited by

Article level Metrics by Paperbuzz/Impactstory
Article level Metrics by Altmetrics

 Article Statistics
HTML = 1344 times
PDF   = 598 times
XML   = 0 times
Total   = 598 times