Science and Technology Development Journal

An official journal of Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam since 1997

Starting from 01-07-2024, all submissions should be made through the new system at: https://www.ejmanager.com/my/stdj/

Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

 Health Sciences - Research article

HTML

26650

Total

643

Share

Evaluation the effect of several anticancer drugs on Vietnamese breast cancer cells






 Open Access

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

In Viet Nam, data from Conference of Cancer organized by the Ministry of Health has shown that breast cancer is the most popular cancer in women. Current mainly treatments are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, the rate of recurrence after five years was very high. One of the causes of high relapse is cancer cells develop multidrug-resistant (MDR) thus reduced the efficiency of treatments. In this research, MTT assay was used for measured cell viability of Vietnamese breast cancer cells (VNBRCA cells) and positive control MCF-7 cell lines after treatment with several anticancer drugs as Doxorubicin (DOX), Tamoxifen (TAM), Mitomycin C (MMC) in 48h. After that, cancer cells were treated at haft maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of anticancer drug and observed cell morphology, apoptosis of cellular nuclear by AO/PI staining. IC50 value of VNBRCA cells with DOX, TAM, MMC were 0.641± 0.07 µM, 4.639 ± 0.933 µM and 1.338 ± 0.176 µM, respectively, which higher than IC50 of MCF-7 with DOX, TAM, MMC was 0.168 ± 0.037 µM, 7.085 ± 0.87 µM and 0.379 ± 0.159 µM, respectively. The response of VNBRCA cells with several anticancer drugs as DOX, TAM, and MMC was lower than the response of MCF-7, therefore, it showed that the specific features of VNBRCA cells; from which develop specific treatments for Vietnamese breast cancer patients.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in Vietnamese women. In the last two decade from 2000 to 2010, the breast cancer incidence has more than double in age-standardized rate (ASR, the ratio per 100,000 people), particularly 13.8 in 2000 and 29.9 in 2010, approximately 12,533 new cases of breast cancer per year 1 . In 2008, the ASR of 100,000 women in Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City respectively 29,7% and 19.4% shown breast cancer still the most common cancer in Vietnamese women 2 . These are many causes of breast cancer in Vietnamese women, such as the age of first menarche and menopause, number of children, using hormone and daily exercise 3 . Breast tumors could be classified into many different subgroups according to their cell surface markers as the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), progesterone receptor (PR) or estrogen receptor (ER) 4 . A survey on 492 breast cancer patients at the National Cancer Hospital of Vietnam in Hanoi from January 2007 to August 2013 showed that 61.6% of cases were ER-positive, 58.5% of cases were PR-positive, 21.4% of cases were Her2-positive, and 15% of cases were triple negative breast cancer (ER-negative, PR-negative, Her2-negative) 5 . The other survival data from Hue Central Hospital and the Cancer Registry in Ho Chi Minh City showed the survival rates at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years following diagnosis were 0.94, 0.83 and 0.74 respectively; and the prognostic factor for mortality of breast cancer patients were stage at diagnosis, health status, marital status, using hormone, education level 6 . Because severe problems of breast cancer, several methods were developed for the treatment, such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. In cancer, surgery is the primary and most fundamental method both in the diagnosis and in cancer treatments. The type of surgery is based on cancer diagnosis, defined cancer states, remove a part or all of the tumor, e.g., the surgery in breast cancer treatment depends on the tumor location, size and other factors, the surgeon could use breast conserving or total mastectomy 7 . Chemotherapy is an effective therapy against various type of human cancer, besides that many cancer cells also develop multidrug-resistant (MDR), the most problems for successful cancer treatment 8 . Many drugs and therapies had been developed to cure breast cancer, such as Doxorubicin, Tamoxifen, Mitomycin C. Doxorubicin (DOX), is one of the most effective and broad-spectrum antibiotic, used in the treatment of a variety of hematology and solid malignancies, included leukemias, Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, breast, lung, ovarian and bladder cancers 9 . 9 10 11

Tamoxifen (TAM) is an antiestrogenic drug, which widely used for treating the patient who exhibits estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer 12 . TAM is a prodrug form that could be metabolized in cytochrome P450 through CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 isoforms to the active form, which called endoxifen 13 14 7 15 16

Mitomycin C (MMC) is the broad-spectrum agent in tumor resistance that targets explicitly in CpG sequences. MMC was able to inhibit DNA synthesis through binding to the amino quinone group. MMC interacted with DNA could form the cross link between two complementary of the DNA strand, which could cause inhibited DNA synthesis and DNA replication 17 .

However, breast cancer has become resistant to treatment, this means that chemotherapy or radiotherapy could not be affected on all cancer cells, most of the cancer cells may have killed, but some of them were either not changed and survive after treatments. Moreover, chemotherapeutic drugs are also toxic with normal cells, which caused several side effects to the patients. Therefore, the rate of tumor recurrence after five years in breast cancer patients still increase, maybe cancer cells had self-changed to resistant with a chemotherapeutic.

The purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of several common anticancer drugs in Vietnam breast cancer cells (VNBRCA) through evaluating the half-maximal inhibition concentrations (IC 50 ), cell viability of cells after anti-cancer drugs treatment.

Methods

Cell lines and chemicals

Human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. Vietnam breast cancer cells were supported by Stem Cell Institute, VNUHCM-University of Science, Viet Nam. Cancer cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium/Ham F12) containing 10% FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum, Invitrogen, CA, USA), 1% antibiotic 100X (Invitrogen, CA, USA) at 37 0 C with an atmosphere of 5%CO 2 . Doxorubicin (DOX) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (44583, CAS number 25316-40-9) and Mitomycin C was purchased from Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co were dissolved in aqueous, Tamoxifen was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (T5648, CAS number 10540-29-1) and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). These anticancer drugs were used for MTT viability assay.

MTT viability assay

Cytotoxic effect on cancer cells was determined by using MTT assay after 48h treatment with anticancer drugs. Cancer cells were seeded onto 96-well plates at density 5.10 3 cells/well, cultured at 37 0 C, 5% CO 2 for 24h. Then, cancer cells were added with anticancer drugs at several concentrations 0 – 20 M and triple replicate in each concentration. Following incubation 48h at 37 0 C 5% CO 2 , added 10 o f MTT solution (5 mg/ml) into 100 cell culture medium and incubated at 37 0 C, 5% CO 2 . After 4 hours incubation, treated plates were centrifuged 500g in 5 minutes, then removed the supernatant, added 100 of DMSO to each well and shaken for ten mins (horizontal shaker) to dissolve the violet formazan crystals. The optical density (OD) was measured by using Beckman Coulter DTX 880 Multimode Detector at 495 nm. The cytotoxic efficiency of anticancer drugs was specified by using the percentage of cell viability at several different concentration. The IC 50 value was determined in the cell viability by GraphPad Prism 7.0 software. Each experiment was repeated in triplicate.

Cell viability (%) = Mean OD/Control OD x 100%

AO/PI staining assay

Acridine Orange/Propidium Iodine (AO/PI) are dyes which bind to nucleic acid and used to observe live/dead cells. Acridine Orange (AO) is a membrane permeable nuclear dye that stains all nucleated cells both in live and dead cells and emits the green fluorescence. While Propidium Iodine (PI) is membrane impermeable nuclear dye that stains dead cells to generate the red fluorescence. For AO/PI double staining, samples were combined with AO/PI Staining Working Solution at ratio 1:1, then cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope. Live cells will emit the green fluorescence (at the excitation 485 nm and the emission 548 nm), and dead cells will generate the red fluorescence (at the excitation 520 nm and the emission 590 nm).

Statistical analysis

The result of experiments was handled by using the GraphPad Prism 7.04 software. The data are performed in three independent experiments.

Results

The IC50 values (50% inhibitory concentration) of anticancer drugs in MCF-7 cells and VNBRCA cells

The cytotoxic efficiency of anticancer drugs as Doxorubicin, Tamoxifen, Mitomycin C against breast cancer cell lines was measured by using MTT assay. After 48h treatment with anticancer-drugs at different doses, cell viability of cancer cells was determined. Results of cytotoxicity assay were presented in Figure 1 and Table 1 .

Figure 1. Cell viability of MCF-7 and VNBRCA1 after treatment with various concentration of anticancer drugs DOX (A, B), TAM (C, D), MMC (E, F).

DOX could inhibit the growth of MCF-7 cells and VNBRCA cells. These cancer cells were treated at the concentration of half dilutions 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125 and 0.0625 µM for 48h and achieved inhibition of the cell growth compared with non-treated cells as a negative control. The cell viability following DOX treatment are shown in Figure 1 A , the IC 50 value of DOX against MCF7 cells and VNBRCA cells was measured from the cell viability by GraphPad Prism 7.0 ( Figure 1 B ) as 0.168 ± 0.037 µM and 0.641± 0.07 µM, respectively ( Table 1 ) . The IC 50 value of DOX on MCF-7 was similar to the result of Chen et al. (2015) was 0.11 ± 0.012 µM 18 .

To examine the inhibition of the growth on cancer cells, these MCF-7 and VNBRCA cells were treated with TAM at the concentration of half dilutions 20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25 and 0.625 µM for 48h, with non-treated cells as a negative control. The cell viability of TAM was shown in ( Figure 1 C ), and the IC 50 value of TAM was 7.085 ± 0.87 µM and 4.639 ± 0.933 µM in MCF-7 and VNBRCA cells, respectively ( Figure 1 D , Table 1 ) . IC 50 value of TAM against MCF-7 is 4,639 ± 0,933 µM, were similarly to result from Hassan et al. with IC 50 of TAM on MCF-7 is 4,506 µg/ml

To investigate the inhibitory effect of MMC, these cancer cells were treated with anticancer drug MMC at the concentration of half dilutions 8, 4, 2, 1, 0.5 and 0.25 µM for 48h, with non-treated cells as a negative control. The result of MTT assay shows the cell viability following MMC treatment ( Figure 1 E ), and the IC 50 value in MCF-7 cells and VNBRCA cells ( Figure 1 F ) respectively were 0.379 ± 0.159 µM and 1.338 ± 0.176 µM ( Table 1 ) .

Table 1 showed the concentration of DOX, TAM and MMC required to inhibit MCF-7 and VNBRCA cell proliferation by 50%. Figure 2 showed the graph of T-test compare the effect of anticancer drugs between cancer cell lines and the morphology of cells after treated with anticancer drugs at the IC 50 value.

Table 1 The IC50 value of both cell lines with anti-cancer drugs

Breast cancer cells were treated with anticancer drugs at the IC 50 values. The statistically different between two cell lines were shown in Figure 3 . Morphological observation of cancer cells after treatment ( Figure 2 ) showed the effect of cancer drugs on cell morphology in cell culture. In DOX and MMC treatment, the sizes of cells were larger than control, while in TAM treatment, cells were smaller, apoptotic cells had a round shape and floated in media culture.

Figure 2. Morphology of cancer cells was cultured with anticancer drugs at IC 50 values.

Apoptosis of cancer cells after treatment with anticancer drugs at IC50

Induction of apoptosis on cancer cells was also investigated by microscopic analysis of AO/PI double staining assay. Nuclei observation was performed to observe the efficiency of anticancer drugs which have the ability to induce apoptosis. Figure 3 and Figure 4 showed the untreated control and the anticancer drug-treated on MCF-7 and VNBRCA cells, respectively. With the green fluorescence, Acridine Orange (AO) showed all the nuclear cells, while in red fluorescence, only apoptotic cells could expose the light. Disintegrated nuclei appeared in the fluorescent images when cells were treated with anticancer drugs indicated that treated cells were undergoing apoptosis, while there were a few of dead cells in the control sample and those cells did not show the abnormal in nuclei DNA.

Figure 3. Fluorescent micrographs of AO/PI double-stained MCF-7 cells after 48h treatment with anticancer drugs.

Discussion

Breast cancer is popular cancer in woman, despite the evolution of treatments, it is still the primary cause of death in female cancer patients. Doxorubicin, Tamoxifen, and Mitomycin C are a widely used drug for treating breast cancer patients. The primary mechanism in the response of cancer cells with chemotherapy is the activation of apoptotic pathways. The cell viability is an important parameter and is directly associated with the cytotoxic effects of a drug 19 .

In this research, DOX and MMC caused apoptosis both in MCF-7 and VNBRCA cells, the IC 50 values of DOX and MMC on VNBRCA cells were higher than on MCF-7 cells ( Table 1 ) . Therefore, therapeutic doses of DOX and MMC used in VNBRCA cells were higher in the treatment of Vietnam breast cancer patients. DOX is a broad spectrums antibiotic used in the treatment of cancers, which could inhibit the DNA synthesis by intercalating into complementary of DNA-strands and inhibit DNA topoisomerase II 20 . Mitomycin C is an antitumor antibiotic which could cause apoptosis through inhibition of DNA synthesis, initiation mutagenesis caused by DNA repair events. In culture, these compounds had decreased the cell viability at increasing concentrations, made the disorganization of the cell nucleus and produced giant cells ( Figure 2 ). DOX and MMC are chemotherapeutic agents whose efficiency is limited by severe side effect, e.g ., the cardiotoxicity of DOX 9 and myelosuppression of MMC 21 . Besides, MCF-7 cells exposed with DOX low-doses could develop the multidrug resistance and the upregulation of MDR1, CD44st, NF- protein and mRNA 22 . These are several factors which could be responsible for broad-spectrum MDR, included over expression of the membrane-bound ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC proteins) such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), MDR-1 and MDR-2. This protein could prevent the accumulation of the drug in intracellular or modify the distribution of anticancer drugs in cancer cells 9 . In the future, novel chemotherapy should design to increase the role of natural products in combination with DOX on cancer therapy and to minimize side effects of DOX. 8 11

The cytotoxicity effect of TAM on VNBRCA cells were higher than on breast cancer cells MCF-7, so the IC 50 value of TAM on VNBRCA cells was lower than on MCF-7 cells ( Table 1 ) . As in the survey at the National Cancer Hospital of Vietnam in Hanoi showed that 61.6% of Vietnam breast cancer cases were ER-positive 5 , so TAM is an appropriate anticancer drug for Vietnam breast cancer patients. TAM can induce apoptosis of cancer cells via the involvement of a mitochondria-dependent pathway, the amendment of signaling protein such as protein kinase C, and the up-regulation of p53 23 . The activity of caspase-9 was direct correlates with the cytotoxic effects of TAM 20 . TAM could be affected on the cell membrane, caused the rapid changes in membrane permeability, offers a very long period of protection after surgery remove tumors and could bring more benefit to breast cancer prevention 15 . Although TAM is one of the most wide drugs in breast cancer treatments, many patients still relapsed after long-term TAM treatment 23 . These are several reasons interpreted why several people could not get the full benefit of TAM as a flaw in the CYP2D6 enzyme, an enzyme to convert TAM into its active form and medications which block the effectiveness of this enzyme. One of the side effects of TAM is could enhance the high risk of endometrial lesions, such as hyperplasia, carcinoma, sarcoma in breast cancer patients 24 . Based on these results, choosing the appropriate chemotherapy should be conformed to cellular characteristics as cell surface marker, molecular features… Each cancer cell lines have different elements would have a dose of anticancer drugs which offer the excellent efficiency, so developing the individual therapy is an innovative trend to bring useful treatment for cancer patients.

Conclusion

Vietnam breast cancer cells were less sensitive to anticancer drugs which evaluated in this work. MTT assay result and microscope images indicated that the cytotoxicity of the extract was dose-dependent. With DOX and MMC, VNBRCA cells were less sensitive than MCF-7 cells, means that high doses of these anticancer drugs would be treated in breast cancer patients, which would cause the high cytotoxicity and more dramatic side effects. With TAM, VNBRCA cells were more sensitive, produced by ER-positive cancer cells. Breast cancer patients need to identify cell surface markers, which could find the appropriate therapy, help to increase the effect of anticancer drugs, reduce the side effect of chemotherapy and the low cost of treatment. The primary cause of therapeutic failure in breast cancer patients is multi-drug resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy, so using a reasonable dose of anticancer drugs may help to cure and prevent the tumor recurrence, improve the survival rate. Besides that, breast self-examination, screening programs, and new treatments should be encouraged and increased the life expectancy of Vietnamese breast cancer women.

Competing Interests

The authors hereby declare there are no conflicts of interest associated with this work.

Acknowledgments

Vietnam National University funded this experiment, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam under grant number A2015-18-01/HD-KHCN and VNUHCM-University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam with grant number T2017-42. The author also thanks to Stem Cell Institute for helping to complete this project.

Abbreviations

IC50 : the half-maximal inhibition concentrations

MTT : 3-(4,5-dimethythiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

DOX : doxorubicin

TAM : tamoxifen

MMC : mitomycin C

References

  1. Jenkins C., Minh L. N., Anh T. T., Ngan T. T., Tuan N. T., Giang K. B.. Breast cancer services in Vietnam: a scoping review. Global Health Action. 2018;11:1435344. Google Scholar
  2. Trieu P. D., Mello-Thoms C., Brennan P. C.. Female breast cancer in Vietnam: a comparison across Asian specific regions. Cancer Biology & Medicine. 2015;12:238-45. Google Scholar
  3. Trieu P. D., Mello-Thoms C., Peat J. K., Do T. D., Brennan P. C.. Risk Factors of Female Breast Cancer in Vietnam: A Case-Control Study. Cancer Research and Treatment. 2017;49:990-1000. Google Scholar
  4. Holliday D. L., Speirs V.. Choosing the right cell line for breast cancer research. Breast Cancer Research. 2011;13:215. Google Scholar
  5. Nguyen J., Le Q. H., Duong B. H., Sun P., Pham H. T., Ta V. T.. A Matched Case-Control Study of Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk in Vietnam. International Journal of Breast Cancer. 2016;2016:7164623. Google Scholar
  6. Lan N. H., Laohasiriwong W., Stewart J. F.. Survival probability and prognostic factors for breast cancer patients in Vietnam. Global Health Action. 2013;6:1-9. Google Scholar
  7. Yang G., Nowsheen S., Aziz K., Georgakilas A. G.. Toxicity and adverse effects of Tamoxifen and other anti-estrogen drugs. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2013;139:392-404. Google Scholar
  8. De U., Chun P., Choi W. S., Lee B. M., Kim N. D., Moon H. R.. A novel anthracene derivative, MHY412, induces apoptosis in doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7/Adr human breast cancer cells through cell cycle arrest and downregulation of P-glycoprotein expression. International Journal of Oncology. 2014;44:167-76. Google Scholar
  9. Wattanapitayakul S. K., Chularojmontri L., Herunsalee A., Charuchongkolwongse S., Niumsakul S., Bauer J. A.. Screening of antioxidants from medicinal plants for cardioprotective effect against doxorubicin toxicity. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2005;96:80-7. Google Scholar
  10. Osman A. M., Bayoumi H. M., Al-Harthi S. E., Damanhouri Z. A., Elshal M. F.. Modulation of doxorubicin cytotoxicity by resveratrol in a human breast cancer cell line. Cancer Cell International. 2012;12:47. Google Scholar
  11. Wang X., Teng Z., Wang H., Wang C., Liu Y., Tang Y.. Increasing the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in breast cancer MCF-7 cells with multidrug resistance using a mesoporous silica nanoparticle drug delivery system. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. 2014;7:1337-47. Google Scholar
  12. Sporn M. B.. Agents for Chemoprevention and Their Mechanism of Action. Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. . 2003;:. Google Scholar
  13. Goetz M. P., Rae J. M., Suman V. J., Safgren S. L., Ames M. M., Visscher D. W.. Pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen biotransformation is associated with clinical outcomes of efficacy and hot flashes. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23:9312-8. Google Scholar
  14. Yuan S., Sun Q., Chen Y., Liao J.. A Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model of Tamoxifen and Endoxifen to Predict Their Distribution and Effects on Inhibition of Tumor Growth. Drug Metabolism Letters. 2017;11:93-101. Google Scholar
  15. Cuzick J., Sestak I., Cawthorn S., Hamed H., Holli K., Howell A., Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: extended long-term follow-up of the IBIS-I breast cancer prevention trial. The Lancet. Oncology. 2015;16:67-75. Google Scholar
  16. Yu F, Bender W. The mechanism of tamoxifen in breast cancer prevention. Breast Cancer Research. 2001;3:A74. Google Scholar
  17. Warren A. J., Mustra D. J., Hamilton J. W.. Detection of mitomycin C-DNA adducts in human breast cancer cells grown in culture, as xenografted tumors in nude mice, and in biopsies of human breast cancer patient tumors as determined by (32)P-postlabeling. Clinical Cancer Research. 2001;7:1033-42. Google Scholar
  18. Chen T., Wang C., Liu Q., Meng Q., Sun H., Huo X.. Dasatinib reverses the multidrug resistance of breast cancer MCF-7 cells to doxorubicin by downregulating P-gp expression via inhibiting the activation of ERK signaling pathway. Cancer Biology & Therapy. 2015;16:106-14. Google Scholar
  19. Hassan F., Mohammed G., El-Hiti G. A., Alshanon A., Yousif E.. Cytotoxic effects of tamoxifen in breast cancer cells. Journal of Unexplored Medical Data. 2018;3:3. Google Scholar
  20. Yang F., Teves S. S., Kemp C. J., Henikoff S.. Doxorubicin, DNA torsion, and chromatin dynamics. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA). Revue Canadienne. 2014;1845:84-9. Google Scholar
  21. Shuhendler A. J., O’Brien P. J., Rauth A. M., Wu X. Y.. On the synergistic effect of doxorubicin and mitomycin C against breast cancer cells. Drug Metabolism and Drug Interactions. 2007;22:201-33. Google Scholar
  22. Fang X. J., Jiang H., Zhu Y. Q., Zhang L. Y., Fan Q. H., Tian Y.. Doxorubicin induces drug resistance and expression of the novel CD44st via NF-κB in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Oncology Reports. 2014;31:2735-42. Google Scholar
  23. Motawi T. K., Abdelazim S. A., Darwish H. A., Elbaz E. M., Shouman S. A.. Modulation of Tamoxifen Cytotoxicity by Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2016;2016:3017108. Google Scholar
  24. Hu R., Hilakivi-Clarke L., Clarke R.. Molecular mechanisms of tamoxifen-associated endometrial cancer (Review). Oncology Letters. 2015;9:1495-501. Google Scholar


Author's Affiliation
Article Details

Issue: Vol 21 No 2 (2018)
Page No.: 44-51
Published: Sep 27, 2018
Section: Health Sciences - Research article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v21i2.488

 Copyright Info

Creative Commons License

Copyright: The Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 How to Cite
Nguyen, O. (2018). Evaluation the effect of several anticancer drugs on Vietnamese breast cancer cells. Science and Technology Development Journal, 21(2), 44-51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v21i2.488

 Cited by



Article level Metrics by Paperbuzz/Impactstory
Article level Metrics by Altmetrics

 Article Statistics
HTML = 26650 times
Download PDF   = 643 times
View Article   = 0 times
Total   = 643 times